The fate of the democrats’ clown show impeachment/coup attempt now rests in the fat fingers of House Judiciary Committee ringleader Jerry Nadler. They haven’t made a case against Trump by any legal standard, but Nadler is insisting a jury would convict the President in “three minutes flat.” If he were bragging that he could clean out an all-you-can-eat buffet in that time period, there might be some validity to his statement but this is more democrat delusion in an effort to overthrow the President of the United States.
“We have a very rock solid case,” @RepJerryNadler says about the House Democrats’ impeachment case. “The case we have if presented to a jury would be a guilty verdict in about three minutes flat.” https://t.co/TWeC2mhpgk #CNNSOTU pic.twitter.com/QCYqBEcK1G
— State of the Union (@CNNSotu) December 8, 2019
Nadler was on CNN Sunday trying to sell democratic party treason when it was pointed out to him that there isn’t much of a case for impeachment against President Trump.
“We have a very rock-solid case. I think the case we have, if presented to a jury, would be a guilty verdict in about three minutes flat,” said Nadler.
How is a guy who knows so little about the law the head of the Judiciary Committee? The democrats have said a lot of dumb things during this sham impeachment inquiry, but this may be the dumbest. It shows that Nadler doesn’t even understand the basics of the American justice justice.
A jury wouldn’t convict Trump in “three minutes flat” because they would never hear his case. In order for there to be a trial, there first must be an indictment for an actual crime. The democrats are plowing through impeachment without specifying what crime President Trump is accused of.
Under Nadler’s fantasy, the jury would deliberate for less than three minutes, which is longer than the democrats have spent looking at the lack of evidence against Trump, and then return a guilty verdict: “Your honor, we find the defendant guilty of stuff and things.” That’s not how it works.
In order to reach a trail by jury, there is a very specific order of things that must happen:
1. A crime was committed.
2. An investigation determines if the crime was committed.
3. Formal charges are submitted and an indictment is handed down.
4. The defendant is allowed to answer those charges.
But here’s what the democrats want the procedure to be:
1. No crime was committed.
2. An investigation showed no crime was committed.
3. No formal charges are submitted, just vague accusations.
4. The defendant is not allowed to answer those vague accusations.
Nadler went on to claim democrats have tons of “direct evidence” and then complained that they don’t have any direct evidence because Trump won’t give it to them, which is as bullshit as it sounds.
“It ill behooves a president or his partisans to say you don’t have enough direct evidence when the reason we don’t have even more direct evidence is the president has ordered everybody in the executive branch not to cooperate with Congress in the impeachment inquiry, something that is unprecedented in American history and is a contempt of Congress by itself,” said Nadler.
How’s that for liberal legal logic? The democrats would be able to prove the president committed an impeachable offense if he would only admit that he had, but since he won’t, that becomes an impeachable offense.
This is literally what the democrats are going to try to impeach President Trump on: He won’t admit he’s guilty of an unspecified crime so therefore he must be guilty of an unspecified crime.
While no jury in the country would convict Trump at all for this, let alone in 3 minutes flat, here’s some things House democrats could do in that time:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could be wrong about 15 different things and complain that the criticism against her is because people are scared of an empowered woman of color.
Ilhan Omar could cash a check from the Qatari government and sleep with her brother.
Eric Swalwell exploit 3 tragedies to push gun control, threaten to kill Americans, and make a dumb face.
Nancy Pelosi could butcher her face with Botox and butcher the English language with senility.
Jerry Nadler could eat 12 boxes of Twinkies.
Adam Schiff could orchestrate another lame coup attempt when “Ukraine quid pro quo” falls flatter then “Russian collusion.”
