Home
Lori ‘F**k Clarence Thomas’ Lightfoot Whines About ‘Toxicity’ in Public Discourse

Lori ‘F**k Clarence Thomas’ Lightfoot Whines About ‘Toxicity’ in Public Discourse

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, after another violent weekend in which there were more than 70 shootings on her city’s streets, has found a new scapegoat to dodge blame for the chaos that befalls her city.

At some level each weekend—despite strict gun laws and an alleged commitment to law and order—‘toxic public discourse’ is now the voiced cause of bloodshed that escapes her magic dust.

This from townhall.com.

Specifically, according to remarks Mayor Lightfoot made on Tuesday:

The toxicity in our public discourse is a thing that I think we should all be concerned about.

Ah, well, if it’s non-toxic public discourse Mayor Lightfoot wants to encourage, she should probably start with herself.

That is, if she doesn’t want to deepen her reputation as an incompetent partisan hypocrite.

Many remember, it was just last week, after all, that she shouted “F**k Clarence Thomas” during her remarks at a Chicago pride event.

This certainly was a very public, very toxic manner in which to conduct her discourse.

Lest you think her profane declaration was merely an emotional off-the-cuff reaction to what someone in the crowd said, here’s Lightfoot doubling down on her statement to F**k a Supreme Court justice:

The mayor followed that tweet up with another element of discourse by saying:

If my language bothers you more than the destruction of our civil rights, then we don’t need to know anything else about you.

What? And this thing is Chicago’s mayor?

Obviously, “toxic public discourse,” as Lightfoot understands it to be, is not a problem when it is her toxically discoursing in public.

But, in all actuality, is Lori Lightfoot not one of the country’s most prolific toxic discourse participants?

Even before she was cursing about Supreme Court justices with whom she evidently disagrees, Lightfoot issued a literal “call to arms” against the highest court in the land—something of an insurrection, by definition—along with her call for “a fight to victory.”

So, again, Mayor Lightfoot thinks “toxicity in our public discourse” is a problem that everyone should be concerned about, but she has no issue making a “call to arms” and saying “F*** Clarence Thomas.”

Is this not how democrats typically operate? Is it not their trademark, their M.O.?
This is the behavior of incompetent, uncaring politicians who stumble along from one crisis to the next making useless blanket statements following each horrific event to appease their constituencies while contradicting their own calls for healing, for repair.
It’s more “do as I say, not as a I do” nonsense mixed with “rules for thee not for me” hypocrisy.

Perhaps, this is what is meant by the words: ‘Windy City.’

In Chicago, the term no longer refers to the weather. It is a description of the Toxic Public Discourse which the mayor of that murder capital handily leads.