Louisiana Librarian Who Championed Sexually Explicit Children’s Books Loses Defamation Suit

A librarian in Livingston Parish, Louisiana, defended the placement of sexually explicit material in the children’s section of the library at which she worked.

This from redstate.com.

Amanda Jones said during a meeting of the parish library board in July:

I find it ironic that any member of the community would want to limit access to any book on reproduction or relocate it away from our children who need it most.

She was called out by conservative groups in Louisiana via their Facebook Pages.

One of the groups, Citizens for a New Louisiana, posted that Jones was trying:

[T]o keep sexually erotic material and pornographic materials in the kids section.

Another page said she was:

[A]dvocating teaching anal sex to 11-year-olds.

Each Facebook page has thousands of followers, and several comments on the pages’ posts also attacked Jones.

In response to those posts, Jones sued both for defamation.

Preliminary hearings on the matter were delayed, but late last week, the judge in the case tossed out the suit, saying that the statements were not defamatory.

The hearing on the preliminary injunction was originally scheduled to take place Aug. 23, but was rescheduled twice due to complications in serving Lunsford and his legal counsel.

Judge Sledge said the court’s role was not to decide if any books in the children’s sections are inappropriate or overly sexual, and added that the defendants were expressing their opinion on the nature of the material and Jones’ support of keeping it in the children’s section, therefore not defaming her.

Michael Lunsford, who heads Citizens for a New Louisiana, said after the ruling that:

It’s unfortunate that if someone disagrees [with you], rather than articulating it they do this.

Lunsford and Ryan Thames, who runs the other Facebook page, Bayou State of Mind, argued that Jones had made herself a public figure, and therefore the standard to prove defamation was much higher.

Judge Erika Sledge said that she considered Jones a limited public figure (Jones had identified herself as an international speaker and president of the Louisiana Association of School Librarians), but that her standing would not have affected the case, as the statements made on the two Facebook Pages were opinion and not assertions of fact.

Ellyn Clevenger, Jones’ lawyer, called the ruling “dangerous” and stated she intended to file an appeal.

There are multiple parishes in Louisiana that are battling similar issues within their library systems.

Critics of sexually explicit books that are ostensibly written for children say they don’t belong in the children’s sections of those libraries.

That material, they argue, is adult in nature and is an attempt to normalize sexuality to underage children, which is a dangerous precedent.

And parents en masse are reasserting their authority to monitor what their children are reading as well as being taught. Until necessary changes are made, the public at large—schools and libraries—must no longer be trusted with the well-being of our children.

However, people defending the books argue that moving them out of the children’s section and into adult sections is the equivalent of banning books.

Say what? This isn’t even a rationale thought to be entertained. Age-inappropriate material SHOULD BE selectively located.

Attempting to rationalize the placement of sexually explicit reading material in the children’s section of a library by stating that moving the materials out is equivalent to banning books is calculating, fraudulent, deceitful.

Final thoughts: Banning sexually explicit books would be removing them entirely from the public library—which should be done, without any objections being entertained. And the perverted librarian should be sent looking for another job. Force her to test the court system with a wrongful termination suit.