Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri said that his office would use “every tool” at its disposal to “root out” an “enterprise of censorship” built by the Obiden Regime, in an exclusive interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation.
This from westernjournal.com.
According to the Missouri Independent:
Bailey’s remarks came just weeks after he was sworn into office on Jan. 3 to replace former Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who now represents the state in the U.S. Senate
A military veteran, Bailey served as the counsel to Missouri Governor Mike Parson prior to his appointment to the attorney general’s office.
The new attorney general inherited several cases from the outgoing Schmitt, most notable among them a lawsuit against the Obiden Regime that alleges that the White House and other federal agencies—including the FBI and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—violated the First Amendment by pressuring social media companies to censor “disfavored” speech.
Bailey said:
Documents that have already been released through the discovery process, in addition to public statements by [The Regime,] indicate that the federal government took advantage of its position of power over social media platforms to silence people.
Bailey told the Daily Caller News Foundation:
It’s not just collusion between federal bureaucrats and big tech social media cronies, it’s coercion.
The [Obiden Regime] bullied and coerced big tech social media into censoring their disfavored speech.
They did this by threatening sanction against big tech social media in the form of antitrust suits and in the form of a repeal of section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which is the gravy train for these big tech social media companies.
Schmitt—alongside Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who is also a plaintiff in the case—in October sought the deposition of former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, alongside several other top Regime officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor.
The Hill reported:
While Fauci was deposed, Psaki’s deposition was halted by an appeals court in early January, which found that since her role in The Regime was not involved in policy-making, there was no evidence suggesting that she had ‘unique first-hand knowledge’ justifying the ‘extraordinary measure’ of deposing a high-ranking former member of the executive branch.
Landry said in response, according to The Hill:
We have no problem with the court’s request. We look forward to obtaining more discovery.
Speaking with the DCNF, however, Bailey took a different tack than his colleague. When asked if he planned to appeal the decision, Bailey said that “all options are on the table.”
Bailey continued:
We are using every tool at our disposal to ensure that we have rooted out this enterprise of government censorship … and we will take as long as it takes to do it, and we will take any deposition that’s needed.
Final thought: Additional necessary legal challenges to the illegitimate residency of Joe Biden and the un-Constitutional actions of the Obiden Regime.
God speed to Conservatism and God speed to the Take Back of our Constitutional Republic.
