With but a few keystrokes, (post-)modern technology’s search engines will spew out the reasons for the impending climate apocalypse, such as fossil fuels, agricultural practices, ad nauseum.
This is somewhat misleading, however, for search engines refrain from identifying the root cause of the carbon emissions “despoiling and imperiling” our planet.
This from amgreatness.com.
NOTE: We humans are the root cause.
While breathing, we drive the fossil fueled vehicles to the party where the host uses his charcoal grill to smoke the meat of methane-spewing cattle raised by big agriculture and shipped by the fossil fueled vehicles to stores where it is refrigerated by coal burning electric plants, which we revile by posting on the internet using a computer running on that same electricity.
Little wonder that within the gaggle of radical green extremists we find:
– [B]oth socialists, who believe only government can control the masses to the extent necessary to save the planet and equitably redistribute wealth, and
– [W]e find Malthusians, who believe we must eliminate the root cause of the carbon emissions propelling the climate apocalypse—[again, that’s we humans].
Fewer people means fewer carbon emissions; and fewer people also means less money has to be redistributed for the sake of “equity,” which pleases rich climate cultists—specifically the World Economic Forum—who can give more money to the cause.
The leftists/globalists are seeking to drastically reduce the numbers of human beings on the planet. And their ongoing means of doing this are:
– The horrific reality of abortion:
[I]n the violence committed upon the yet born child [is] praised and pushed by the climate cultists as a ‘liberating’ right.
Tragically, this reduction in millions of lives has long been underway; and, even post-Dobbs, continues almost unabated. Yet, this is not enough death for the Left.
– As warned previously, euthanasia is the next frontier in the Left’s battle for “liberating” one from life:
Best to keep an eye on Canada’s MAiD [“Medical Aid in Dying”] policies. The American Left does, and they like what they see. It’s why they want to ensure Canada’s assisted-suicide laws roll downhill to America.
Sure, all life’s paths lead but to the grave. But we shouldn’t hurry to get there.
These methods of death, of course, stop short of calling the leftists’/globalists’ actions for what they are: human sacrifices.
As reported by Catholic Vote’s Madalaine Elhabbal:
The American Medical Association (AMA) [hasl debated] whether to reverse its stance on assisted suicide this month at its interim meeting.
A set of resolutions, proposed by AMA’s Resident and Fellow section, suggest the AMA should abandon its opposition to assisted suicide, adopting instead a neutral stance on the practice.
The resolutions also propose changing the official language from “assisted suicide” to “medical aid in dying” (MAID) at the meeting, which [has taken] place November 10-14.
We await the AMA’s published results, however, until then the AMA deems euthanasia “fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer.”
Yet, the AMA has already bottomed out on the slippery slope of allowing abortion; now, it is on verge of digging to rock bottom by further devolving the physician’s role from healer to killer.
Indeed, having seen the success of its political arguments in favor of abortion—including all the way up until birth and beyond, if initially botched—the Left is again framing the debate as one of the vox populi clamoring for this ‘right of self-determination’ and ‘matter of personal autonomy.’
These are the same leftists/globalists, whose commitment to “personal autonomy” included supporting compulsory COVID vaccinations, now want to add euthanasia to the list of ways we may exit this “dying planet.”
How long until the Leftists, who violate health care providers’ freedom of conscience by demanding they perform abortions and/or attend mandatory DIE cult (“diversity, inclusion, and equity”), compel and/or coerce them into assisting suicides?
Presently, the AMA is on record as having rejected the Left’s attempt to sanction assisted suicide. Indeed, the AMA has also rejected replacing the term “assisted suicide” with the euphemism “medical assistance in dying.”
As National Review’s Wesley J. Smith reminds us, the AMA’s current policy remains in place and says in pertinent part:
Euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.Euthanasia could readily be extended to incompetent patients and other vulnerable populations.
Mr. Smith concludes on an optimistic note:
The death agenda can be stopped. Onward.
Perhaps, but history instructs us that this is less an instance of the death agenda being stopped than merely being paused. The heralds of the Cult of Death never take “no” for an answer from their victims.
In pushing the death agenda’s twin evils of abortion and euthanasia, the “compassionate” leftist/globalist seeks the power to kill us coming or going.
