Whether we have elected officials who have been bought and are compromised (receiving bribes) would more likely garner a ‘Yes’ answer.
Therefore, who is actually running our government? Obama telecommuting from wherever and pulling strings? George and/or Alex Soros pulling strings they bought? A gaggle of billionaire funders pulling strings? China?
Certainly not the compromised uniparty congress taking destroy-America directions to an anal-retentive fault. They’re the ones being bought.
The following from frontpagemag.com.
During Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s incapacity, we learned that her office was running as usual. So was Sen. Fetterman’s office. Staffers went on issuing press releases, taking positions, and co-sponsoring bills on their behalf.
The news release read:
Senator Feinstein just introduced the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2023 to mandate abortion nationwide while outlawing state restrictions on late-term abortion when babies can feel pain…
But Feinstein wasn’t really introducing or sponsoring bills, her staffers—who announced her retirement without her knowing about it—were legislating in her name.
This has become routine. Our government isn’t run by elected officials. And sometimes the elected officials aren’t even there. They have AI filling in for them—and We the People are likely better off for it.
Susan Zhuang, who was elected to represent a newly created Asian-majority district in southern Brooklyn, admitted she uses popular AI tools like ChatGPT after being confronted by The Post about AI-generated answers she submitted for a recent Q and A interview with the media outlet City & State.
When asked, “What makes someone a New Yorker?”
Zhaung sent back a 101-word response that began with:
New York City, the concrete jungle where dreams come true. It’s not just a place, it’s a state of mind. Being a New Yorker means having an unstoppable hustle, unbreakable resilience and unrivaled independence. …
Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime New York-based communist/globalist political consultant, said he’s heard of elected officials using AI for campaigning—but never to respond to general questions from reporters or other members of the public. He fears it “could be the wave of the future.”
He said:
It is very troubling. We’d be better off with robots
in public office—at least we would know what we got.
A good point. Between staffers and AI, to what extent do we even have anything resembling the government envisioned by the Founding Fathers?
Susan Zhuang may not actually speak English, so she’s using AI to spit out cliches.
Zhuang, who speaks fluent Mandarin, later texted a reporter a prepared statement saying:
[A]s an immigrant and Brooklyn’s first Chinese-American Councilwoman, I, like many of my fellow immigrants, use AI as a tool to help foster deeper understanding as well as for personal growth, particularly when English is not my primary language.
Sure, creating formulaic answers using AI may very well deepen understanding—but understanding of what?
If we’re going to have politicians who are really a combination of their staffers and AI, what sort of government do we even have?
Again, who is actually running our government?
