During the three long years of the Obiden Regime, the Supreme Court has made a huge impact by way of rulings that have overturned the top pillars of the communist/globalist (democrat) crime syndicate platform.
And there are several additional key cases the court is deciding right now which will affect most Americans.
This from thepatriotjournal.com.
Now, President Trump is appealing to the highest court over an attack against his campaign. How the Court rules could decide who becomes the next president or such threats as a Civil War II.
From The Post Millennial:
On Wednesday, Donald Trump and his lawyers appealed to the United States Supreme Court to reverse a ruling made by Colorado’s highest court that rendered him ineligible to appear on the ballot in the state under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment.
Trump’s legal team petitioned the Supreme Court to overrule Colorado’s decision to ban him from state ballots.
His team is arguing that state courts do not have the power to decide if a candidate is eligible. That power, they claim, is reserved only for Congress.
This is a strong move. Should the Supreme Court rule that only Congress can use the 14th Amendment to ban someone from the ballot, Trump will be safe from any more attacks.
And such a decision will mean that if the Left wants to remove Trump, they will have to rely on Congress to pass a bill.
Both chambers of Congress agreeing to pass such a controversial and radical piece of legislation is highly unlikely. Even more unlikely would be Joe Biden signing such a bill—that bars his biggest rival from running against him.
Presently, nothing is known about how the court will decide.
The Supreme Court might not even take up the appeal. But this could be a valid case for the highest court, given how it affects both the Constitution and U.S. democracy.
After Colorado’s Supreme Court kicked Trump off the ballot, Maine’s secretary of state did so as well.
These officials have been accused of holding a partisan bias against Trump. They have condemned him for “insurrection” over January 6, despite there not having been any court convicting him of a crime.
