President Trump hailed the Supreme Court’s decision regarding presidential immunity:
BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY.
PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!
This from newsmax.com.
The court on Monday extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against President Trump on charges he (questioned the 2020 stolen presidential election), all but ending prospects the president could be tried before the November election.
Little more than an hour later, the president said the court’s opinion should end all of the legal cases he’s facing.
Trump posted on Truth Social:
Today’s Historic Decision by the Supreme Court should end all of Crooked Joe Biden’s Witch Hunts against me, including the New York Hoaxes—The Manhattan SCAM cooked up by Soros backed D.A., Alvin Bragg, Racist New York Attorney General Tish James’ shameless ATTACK on the amazing business that I have built, and the FAKE Bergdorf’s ‘case.’ PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!
The court’s decision in a second major Trump case this term, along with its ruling rejecting efforts to bar him from the ballot because of his actions following the 2020 election, underscores the direct and possibly uncomfortable role the justices are playing in the November election.
The justices knocked out one aspect of the indictment. The opinion found Trump is ‘absolutely immune’ from prosecution for alleged conduct involving discussions with the Justice Department.
Trump is also “at least presumptively immune” from allegations that he tried to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject certification of Joe Biden’s electoral vote (steal) on Jan. 6, 2021.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote:
Prosecutors can try to make the case that Trump’s pressure on Pence still can be part of the case against him.
The court directed a fact-finding analysis on one of the more striking allegations in the indictment—that Trump participated in a scheme to enlist fake electors in battleground states (stolen) by Biden who would assert that Trump had won.
Both sides had dramatically different interpretations as to whether that effort could be construed as official, and the conservative justices said determining which side is correct would require additional analysis at the trial court level.
