The Left is rightfully panicked that even with the millions of illegals they are registering to vote, they will not be able to cheat their way to victory in November.
This from frontpagemag.com.
Most concerning of all to them: Comrade Kamala is unable to draw male voters, so her campaign has desperately begun trying to win over a voting bloc the Left neither respects nor understands.
The Left adamantly insists men are reluctant to vote for Kamala because they are locked into a longstanding, patriarchal, sexist mindset. This is the same excuse Hillary Clinton fell back on in her 2016 loss to Trump.
She told reporters after the election:
Yes, I do think [misogyny] played a role. [It is] very much a part of the landscape politically, socially and economically.
Fact check: False.
Misogyny is not ‘very much a part of the landscape politically, socially and economically.’ Hillary couldn’t become President not because she’s a woman but because she’s an unlikeable, power-mad radical and kleptocrat who reeks of contempt for America and its citizens.
So, since the DNC back in August, the Left has been making a coordinated push to sell Doug “Second Gentleman” Emhoff and Comrade Kamala’s running mate Tim Walz as models of a more evolved, “21st century masculinity” (as viewed through a feminist lens).
What characterizes this new-and-improved manliness is a deferential willingness to step aside and let a woman take the reins of power. That’s it—that’s the only use the feminized Left has for men: to get out of the way because hey, ‘The Future is Female.’
NOTE: Recent “reports claim Doug Emhoff was ‘misogynistic’ and flirtatious at work,” as well as allegedly having slap a past girlfriend. These accusations pose a danger to Emhoff’s feminist and ‘wife guy’ image, which the Comrade Kamala campaign has worked hard to foster.
No Leftist male outreach has been quite so pathetic: The 90-second video—from a progressive activist organization called Vote Save America and directed by Jimmy Kimmel Live! alumnus Jacob Reed—features a handful of men in various “manly” settings like a home gym, a ranch, and the back of a pickup truck.
All of it feels stiffly staged by an ad film crew that wouldn’t know manly if it spanked their chapped behinds during a Pride Parade.
“I’m a man,” each of the men asserts directly to the camera.
……
“Woman wants to be president?” says an awkwardly posed Tailgate Guy with a lisp, “Well, I hope she has the guts to look me right in the eye and accept my full-throated endorsement.”
……
The ad wraps up with the paid actors declaring they love women who support their families and take charge. Tailgate Guy proclaims, “I’m man enough to help them win.”
Male feminists for Kamala commercial just dropped. pic.twitter.com/3pICi0DYGS
— The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial) October 11, 2024
The ad justifiably drew almost universal mockery on social media, yet director Reed believes it will resonate with male voters.
His defense of the ad is cringeworthy; he wrote on his Substack:
With the rise of role models like Tim Walz and Doug Emhoff on the national stage, I think the left is finally finding its footing on how to talk about masculinity—I think we’re overdue for a redefinition of what it means to be a man in America and I hope this campaign can start to shape that conversation.
Sexism is not the reason Kamala can’t attract male voters. Even Republican men, whom the Left sneer at as misogynist troglodytes, would have no problem voting for the right woman for POTUS, but men won’t vote for Kamala quite simply because she is epically incompetent and unpresidential, among other weaknesses. Politics aside, she is just not a leader.
God speed to the Trump-Vance team and to the Take Back of our Constitutional Republic.
