There are those few world leaders who champion national sovereignty, secure borders, economic protectionism, and oppose globalist institutions like the UN and the EU.
This from survivethenews.com.
Donald J. Trump and Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary
Many, also, are ethnic nationalists and advocates for religious values, traditional family, and cultural preservation.
A starter list would include: Donald Trump, Viktor Orbán (Hungary), Jair Bolsonaro (Brazil), Andrzej Duda (Poland), Giorgia Meloni (Italy), Marine Le Pen (France), Aleksandar Vučić (Serbia), Javier Milei (Argentina), Nayib Bukele (El Salvador), Benjamin Netanyahu (Israel), and Vladimir Putin (Russia).
A broader list to include those who are not sitting leaders would include: Nigel Farage (UK), André Ventura (Portugal), Tino Chrupalla and Alice Weidel (Germany), Santiago Abascal (Spain), Edmundo Urrutia and Maria Machado (Venezuela), Maxime Bernier (Canada), and Geert Wilders (The Netherlands) who has been called Europe’s last hope against Islamist extremism.
Though not a head of state, Wilders is highly influential, having secured ministers from his party in the Dutch government. This means that his nationalist and anti-globalist policies now shape the new administration, as the Freedom Party holds a strong position in parliament.
Wilders has long called for reduced EU influence over Dutch sovereignty, pushing for a “Nexit” and rejecting the euro currency.
His platform focuses on stricter immigration controls, particularly against [moslem] migrants, and preserving Dutch cultural identity.
His strong stance on national security, law enforcement, and immigration aligns with his broader anti-EU and anti-globalist agenda.
Next, why include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?
[P]rior to October 7th, he showed globalist tendencies, such as implementing vaccine mandates and embracing trade and diplomatic policies that deepened Israel’s engagement with China, the United Nations, and the World Trade Organization.
However, Israel itself is inherently a religious, ethnic, nationalist state. Netanyahu has always maintained strong border control, restricted immigration, and fiercely defended Israel’s sovereignty.
For instance, he stood with Donald Trump in opposition to the Iran nuclear deal and has consistently pushed back against criticism from the EU and other global entities.
Since the war began, Netanyahu has been under even more intense pressure as global institutions demand compromises with terrorists, which he has firmly refused.
Additionally, China’s alignment with the Iran axis has further isolated Netanyahu, leaving him to stand against the pro-Hamas, woke global opposition.
Not included herein are sitting heads of state that perhaps should be. They have been vilified by mainstream media and frequently compared to Hitler for opposing open-borders policies. They are Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (Philippines) and Robert Fico (Slovakia), although Vladimir Putin (Russia) is similarly treated but is included.
Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is a conservative with nationalist leanings, and although he may not be as explicitly anti-globalist as some, he has consistently emphasized Philippine sovereignty, particularly in foreign policy and economic development. He increased defense spending and opposes China’s expansion in the South China Sea.
Marcos Jr. appeals to conservative voters who prioritize national pride and security, and his policies reflect a broader anti-globalist sentiment, often framed as a continuation of his father’s strongman legacy, protecting the nation from external pressures.
Robert Fico is known for his conservative and nationalist policies, positioning himself as a strong opponent of globalism. Fico has consistently prioritized Slovak sovereignty and security, opposing migration policies pushed by the European Union and advocating for stricter immigration controls, particularly against moslem migrants.
His stance resonates with conservative voters who are concerned about preserving Slovak cultural identity and resisting foreign influence. Fico is also critical of Western liberalism, which he believes undermines traditional values.
In May of this year, he was critically wounded in an assassination attempt, shot multiple times at close range and requiring emergency surgery. Despite the severity of his injuries, he returned to work and has not resigned.
Vladimir Putin holds a strong anti-U.S. stance, however, he clearly fits the mold of a conservative, anti-globalist, ethno-nationalist leader. Putin and Trump seem to get along well, so perhaps the presumed anti-U.S. stance concerns the Obiden-Harris regime only—time will tell.
As the president of Russia, Putin has consistently opposed Western-led global institutions and policies, seeking to reassert Russian sovereignty and independence from globalist influence, particularly from the U.S. and NATO.
[Putin’s] policies focus on protecting Russian interests, promoting traditional values, and resisting Western liberalism, which he views as corrosive to Russian culture.
Putin has also championed Russian ethno-nationalism, emphasizing the importance of Russian identity and promoting policies that favor the Russian Orthodox Church, traditional family values, and a distinct cultural heritage.
His anti-immigration stance, along with his efforts to resist EU influence, further aligns him with these other conservative leaders who prioritize national sovereignty over global cooperation.
Final thoughts: If granted the opportunity, President Trump will have a strong international team with whom to work. The targets include stopping and turning around world-wide uncontrolled immigration, including moslem expansion; destroying the Deep State that exists in each of the world’s countries; ending the push of world globalism; and as noted above, championing national sovereignty, border security, and economic protectionism.
God speed to President Trump and to World Conservatism.
