The Left’s Prep for Loss: Differently Than ’16 But Hopefully with Minimal Violence

The pink pussycat hats. A Women’s March that drew a half-million demonstrators to the nation’s capital. Millions of other demonstrators nationwide.

It was all part of the Left’s reaction to Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016.

This from newsmax.com.

 

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that this go around with Trump may be quite different.

He is no longer an unknown entity and he holds a commanding lead in all the polls—even the ones with the liberals’ thumbs on the scales for the crumbling communist/globalist backroom cabal selectee Comrade Kamala, who has apparently stopped campaigning.

Still there will be shock on the part of the liberal sycophants who are believing the lies the mass propaganda media is disseminating about the polls having the candidates neck and neck, but the shock to the systems of millions of liberals will not be as intense—because they have known all along that Dementia Joe and Comrade Kamala are not what they have been made out to be.

Jim Hannon, a psychotherapist and liberal organizer in Massachusetts, counseled calm in an open letter last week, noting the strength of Harris’ campaign while urging a broader perspective.

He wrote:

Trump could win. So, panic then? No. A Trump presidency would be awful but not the end of history.

On a recent evening, the Journal reported, more than 200 joined a Zoom meeting titled Mass Training For Women’s Safety Teams hosted by a Women’s March veteran who noted its timing amid “escalating political violence.”

Erin Gately, a 47-year-old physician assistant told the Journal:

We feel like we’re doing something.

After Trump won in 2016, she took to the streets to protest but said this time she would focus on tangible actions such as protecting abortion rights.

Danielle Deiseroth, 28, executive director of Data for Progress, a liberal research group, told the Journal she has been:

[T]alking with leaders of other progressive nonprofits about how to push back if Trump is elected.

She said she anticipates progressives will look to Democrat governors as political torchbearers and Democrat attorneys general to contest Trump initiatives.

The Journal reported:

Laurie Woodward García, a South Florida activist, founded People Power United during Trump’s presidency to champion progressive causes, and, in her words, ‘stand up to fascism.’

Her bimonthly online seminars, some scheduled for after the election, explore the consequences if Trump were to enact Project 2025, a conservative policy agenda created by the Heritage Foundation from which he has distanced himself. Each session has drawn about 500 viewers.

She said:

We’ve got to be optimistic and fight like hell.

That might be complicated by the uncertain trajectory of the Democratic Party, which would be at a generational crossroads with Barack Obama, the Clintons and President Biden all off the stage and no clear heir apparent should Harris lose.

South Carolina state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter of Orangeburg told the Journal:

We’ll be in rebuilding mode.

Final thoughts: We the People should be so fortunate as to have the mentally ill of liberalism behave themselves following Trump’s landslide victory next week.

In fact the above testimonies are so smartly worded, if the identifying terms were changed, I’d believe these people were conservatives. They seem to be planning to conduct themselves as I have done the past four years and the Obama eight years—no violence but a determination that change is needed.