Who and What Else Lost in Tuesday’s Election

Much to the appreciation of We the People, not only did What’s Her Name suffer a humiliating defeat, but the Left on a much wider scale also suffered from the loss.

This from redstate.com.

Trump supporters tuned into The View for the first time ever to watch the post-election melt down.

Probably the biggest faction to lose is the obvious one—the mass propaganda media. There is no doubt they were fully behind What’s Her Name. The colluding propaganda media bet hard on her “as they pushed their chips all in while holding a pair of threes, and the voting public called their bluff.”

Currently, the news creation outlets and those who call themselves journalists are grieving, and this will long prove to be entertaining for We the People.

They were the obvious losers, but there are other less-obvious losers as well that suffered severe setbacks on Tuesday night. Read on and enjoy:

TIM WALZ

The Minnesota governor was a barely regarded figure going into the summer, but the withering of Dementia Joe and having What’s Her Name add him to the ticket brought Tiananmen Tim to national attention—and it cost him dearly in the end.

His past controversies were dredged up, the reliance on him to draw in male voters had alpha males laughing as he failed repeatedly—at drawing football plays, at hunting, and even playing video games.

He called Trump and J.D. Vance “weird,” all the while demonstrating his knuckleheaded demeanor and his light-in-the-loafers swagger. His political future is toast.

IAN SAMS

The former Big Hill Clinton spokesman was pulled from the Biden camp to run his second failed presidential campaign. He was a regular feature on the news network, essentially delivering the campaign work for them to do on behalf of the sheltered candidate, and look how that turned out.

He ended things by trying to insist that Trump’s appearance at a McDonald’s and in the cab of a garbage truck were his “Dukakis Moments,” all while the public was raving about those moments.

HOLLYWEIRD

Like most elections, the celebrity set was trotted out to back the Left, but in this election, those endorsements felt quite devalued. Hollyweird is liberal by default, so seeing these luminaries touting What’s Her Name did not move the needle as most people reacted with a “Well yeah, of course” kind of reaction.

Nobody thought Beyoncé would have ever backed Trump. Bruce Springsteen’s endorsement was met with yawns.

The press exploded over Taylor Swift’s promotion but failed to recognize a bulk of her fan base is too young to even vote.

The best is the late-night gabbers using their shows now not to entertain audiences but to serve as their therapy sessions.

DEI

This topic was brought up soon after the candidate was anointed, and her campaign suffered as a result.

The [Left] and the press tried to imply it was racist to suggest [she] was a DEI candidate, but what it ended up doing was having people regard her as just that.

The announcement by Biden that he would choose a POC female for a running mate basically defines the term.

A sign of how this concept was being denigrated during this election played out as a number of companies came out with announcements they were dropping their DEI programs.

ANN SELZER

The once highly regarded trollster came out with a jarring poll the weekend ahead of the election, and the press exploded with excitement. Selzer claimed her poll of Iowa showed a shocking 21-point swing from months earlier and that the candidate had spun things and held a +3 percent lead.

This was an obvious propaganda stunt—or she is an idiot—Selzer was off by a full 16 percentage points. She will be rightly disregarded in future elections.

Democratic Influencers

The online voices on social media who pumped out perpetual pro-party agit-prop have long been exposed as pocketing cash from the DNC, despite their denials. Now that the election has concluded and their influence was shown to be non-existent, the likes of Harry Sisson, Brooklyn Dad, Jo From Jersey, and many other unconnected dupes will likely see those paychecks stop flowing and then they will fade from the timelines.

Democratic Masculinity

The male vote was proven to be the big challenge for the campaign, and this was augmented by the attempts to curry favor with males this fall. The party that has spent so much energy slandering toxic males suddenly faced the need to draw those they had demonized, and they were clueless.

[Tiananmen Tim] was sold as a hunter, yet he could not handle his gun. Doug Emhoff was sold as a sex symbol when in reality men would move to sit across the bar away from him.

They delivered a farcical ad of “men” (actors) supporting Kamala. And, of course, there was the laughable group “White Dudes for Harris” that managed only to gather those already under the Leftist umbrella.

ESTEE PALTI

Probably the preeminent candidate imitator out there, she sees the promising four years become reduced to a mere two-plus more months of relevancy for her mockery. In similar fashion, Maya Rudolph will see her return to “Saturday Night Live” become truncated as a result.

DORITOS

It was one of the attempts to humanize the candidate—“she loves herself some Doritos chips!”

Why this was seen as a character-building facet is not entirely clear, but the campaign felt it was a building block to have her connect with voters.

So much so, there was that cringe-fest video of the staged visit to a Sheetz convenience store when both Dougie Emhoff and Tiananmen Tim were shown procuring a bag of the snack chips for the candidate. Frito-Lay will miss out on four years of free advertising as a result of her defeat.

Final thoughts: Losers all. And a hateful good riddance to What’s Her Name.