The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity is nothing less than a tour de force.
This from frontpagemag.com.
As Steve Bannon said in his foreword:
[I]t’s a searing indictment of Big Pharma, the legacy media, and the D.C. swamp, not to mention a definitive account of how both Pfizer and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) perpetrated a massive fraud upon not just the American public but the entire world, and not just for a day or two but for a period of years.
In her introduction, Wolf explained that lawyer Adam Siri sued the FDA to gain access:
– to Pfizer’s internal records relating to the results of clinical testing of its mRNA injection for COVID-19, and
– to adverse events reported after the jab began to be administered to the public.
The result was the release of 450,000 pages of documents the FDA had unsuccessfully—and inexplicably—asked a judge to keep secret for 75 years. But what to do with such a massive archive, especially given that it included so much information that could only be made sense of by a range of medical and scientific specialists?
The answer:
Wolf recruited some 3,250 professionals around the world—immunologists, oncologists, obstetricians, pharmacologists, biologists, chemists, and so on, not to mention lawyers—to study the documents and explain their significance.
The “bought-off media,” as she puts it, had called the Pfizer jab “safe and effective.” But where did the truth lie?
The truth—the somber truth—was that the top brass at Pfizer had known by April 2021 that their injections “damaged the hearts” of young people. They knew that the jab had a myriad of other side effects—and that it was especially unsafe for pregnant women, young mothers, fetuses, and infants. Yet Pfizer withheld this and other vital information from the public, and government officials in the U.S., the UK, the EU, and Australia sought to suppress it.
And speaking of results:
An alarming number of people who’d received the Pfizer jab experienced liver damage (50% of them within 3 days of getting the shot), cardiac problems (50% within one day), neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis and Guillain-Barre syndrome (50% within one day), or kidney injuries and renal failure (50% within 4 days). People perished from anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, blood vessel inflammation, and vasculitis, among other complaints. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) appeared for the first time in the world since 2004.
Pathologists routinely told the families of people who died from these ailments that they were the result of natural causes; when the families asked for autopsies by other pathologists, those pathologists refused even to look at micrographs of the deceased individuals’ cells.
Finally Arne Burkhardt, a pathologist in Germany, agreed to look at the slides, and shared them with specialists in relevant fields—biology, chemistry, physics, etc.
Burkhardt and his colleagues determined:
[T]he Pfizer shot had played a role in more than 80% of the deaths. So widespread were these deaths during the pandemic that Burkhardt found it necessary to coin a new term—Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)—to describe a phenomenon that had, until then, been entirely unknown in all of human history.
What was determined:
– [P]regnant women, new mothers, fetuses, and infants suffered disproportionately,
– Birth rates dropped,
– In many places, infants and children under twelve were given the jab seven months before it was approved for pediatric patients, and
– During a period when it wasn’t approved for children under twelve, injections gave rise to such anomalies as “Bell’s palsy in a 1-yr-old, stroke in a 7-yr-old, and renal failure in an infant.
Meanwhile:
– [O]ver 54% of the pregnant women who were exposed to the vaccine had adverse effects,
– 19% of babies exposed via breast milk had adverse effects, and
– 23% of vaccinated mothers’ fetuses or newborns died.
Further:
[O]ver 80 percent of the pregnancies followed resulted in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion.
And yet, according to The Pfizer Papers one Pfizer document reported, beyond all logic, “that mRNA in breast milk was safe.”
The crucial point here is that not only did the Pfizer shot imperil fetuses, babies, and their mothers—Pfizer and the FDA knew it.
For whatever reason, however, they made an “aggressive effort” to inject pregnant women anyway, with CDC director Rachel Walensky explicitly urging at a White House briefing:
[P]regnant women get the jab.
Burkhardt’s recommendation was diametrically opposed to Walensky’s:
If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a person, from a man, who has been vaccinated….Stop this vaccination at once.
The Pfizer shot posed a threat not just to babies but to minors generally… Nonetheless there was:
[A] $1 billion campaign to scare and cajole parents into having their children injected to keep them safe.
Beyond a doubt, one thing is clear now:
Pfizer knew by November 2020 that its mRNA Covid vaccine was neither safe nor effective. By early 2021, Pfizer found “significant harms and deaths” among those who got the jab. But instead of protecting the public from it, Pfizer played with the statistics:
[I]nvestigators used very small numbers to determine that efficacy was high. Then they ignored the same small numbers to determine safety, which included dismissal of adverse effects that occurred within a short time after doses. The methods that were good enough for efficacy were suddenly not good enough for safety.
In short:
[I]nvestigators used a test for efficacy that they knew was not valid.
Now, let us ask, ‘Why would Pfizer want to do such damage?’
***Wolf’s personal hypothesis is:
Pfizer—and perhaps the other producers of mRNA injections for COVID—was engaged with the Chinese Communist Party and, presumably, with key figures in the Western Deep State and legacy media in a deliberate scheme to depopulate the planet while eroding Western freedoms with an eye to nurturing a Marxist orthodoxy with a ‘compliant, fearful workforce.’
Wolf also noted:
China and Australia both established concentration camps for those who refused to get the jab—and New York governor Kathy Hochul was eager to do so as well, but was blocked by opponents.
Final thoughts: We who read Def-Con News have known or at least suspected all of what is above, but still this report is emotionally numbing. As a society, we may have dodged a bullet but at what expense?
Apologies for the length of this post, but there was nothing more I could cut and I may have cut too much. Click HERE for the full article.
