The First 2024 Election Investigation Coming—GOP Leaders in Arizona Make Major Accusations

Concerning the 2020 presidential election, prove fraud and ballot mishandling have We the People exasperated and with more questions than answers.

States like Arizona and Pennsylvania were particularly infamous for their inability to count votes efficiently. The Left in several other states had verifiably cheated.

This from thepatriotjournal.com.

We the People were given a masterclass in how not to run an election. We have been wondering if we will ever see a smooth, transparent election again.

Fast forward to 2024. The presidential election ended with a decisive win for Donald Trump. Most states handled their business like seasoned pros. Ballots were counted, results were clear, and Americans received their answers in a timely manner.

But some states—unsurprisingly—have failed to perform up to civil requirements. The usual suspects dragged their feet, taking weeks to finalize results. It was like they were stuck in a time loop, forever fumbling through the basics of democracy.

One state in particular, Arizona, finds itself under the microscope again, with serious allegations of misconduct and mismanagement surfacing.

From Fox News:

Republican lawmakers in Arizona are calling for Pima County recorder Gabriella Cazares-Kelly to be investigated for her handling of the 2024 General Election, accusing her of closing an early ballot request portal before the legal deadline for early ballot requests, among two other claims of potential misconduct.

Representatives Teresa Martinez and Rachel Jones have called for a full investigation, citing numerous “significant and highly concerning issues.” Among their concerns is the mishandling of voter registrations for inmates, which may have allowed ineligible individuals to vote.

Add murky procedures for tracking undeliverable ballots, and you’ve got a recipe for chaos. No wonder Arizona’s election integrity is being called into question—again.

Cazares-Kelly, a self-proclaimed progressive democrat (communist/globalist), defended her office by blaming district boundary errors and the high volume of duplicate ballot requests.

According to her:

[O]nly 39% of online ballot requests processed before October 19 were valid.

But critics do not believe her. Martinez and Jones argue that voters deserve transparency, not excuses, and they have urged Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes to step in.

This is not the first time Pima County has been in the spotlight for election issues. Critics say this is part of a broader pattern of mismanagement and lack of accountability.

Even Maricopa County, infamous for its slow vote counts, managed to garner praise from MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell—a sure sign something is amiss. Meanwhile, Pima County voters are left wondering why their elections cannot run as smoothly as in, say, Florida or Texas.

Arizona’s handling of undeliverable ballots is another sore spot. Martinez and Jones claim their repeated inquiries about compliance with state election laws went unanswered.

Silence, it seems, has become the default response from election officials when confronted with concerns.

Cazares-Kelly insists her team did everything possible to ensure voters received their ballots. She even claims to have emailed 3,900 voters with instructions to expedite their requests via phone.

But for many, the damage was already done. It is hard to feel confident in a system that seems to break down every election cycle.

Arizona’s Attorney General Kris Mayes has yet to comment on the investigation request, but the pressure is mounting.

Lawmakers argue that election integrity is the foundation of democracy, and Arizona’s voters deserve better. With nearly 4,000 ballots potentially mishandled and ongoing concerns about compliance, this is not an issue that can be swept under the rug.

For her part, Cazares-Kelly seems determined to frame the criticism as a misunderstanding. But voters, lawmakers, and election watchdogs are not convinced. They are demanding answers—and accountability.