House GOP Passes Bill Protecting Women Sports, BTW Nutty AOC Feigns Major Meltdown

On Tuesday the House of Representatives passed a bill protecting women’s sports from biological males.

The vote was closer than common sense would have us believe.

The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act passed with a decisive 216-206 margin. Every single Republican voted in favor. Two Democrats crossed party lines to support it.

The bill’s language is crystal clear. Schools receiving federal funding cannot allow biological males to compete in women’s sports. President-elect Trump backed these protections last October, having stated:

The president bans it. You just don’t let it happen.

But Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez couldn’t handle this basic reality check. In a shocking House floor speech, she claimed Republicans support women “bleeding out in parking lots across the country.”

What a NUT!!

And she ranted on about “genital examinations” of little girls. She claimed the bill would force women to “perform a very specific kind of femininity.”

None of these claims appear anywhere in the bill’s text. Not one word.

Recent polling shows why this bill matters to regular Americans. A whopping 69% of voters oppose letting biological males compete in women’s sports. That includes majorities of Republicans, Leftists (democrats), and Independents.

Parents across the country are speaking out. Sarah Mitchell, whose daughter lost a track scholarship to a transgender athlete last year, stated it simply enough for even the cognitively challenged AOC to understand:

This isn’t about hate. It’s about fairness.

And she is not alone. More than 40,000 parents signed a petition supporting the bill. They know what is at stake.

Dr. Ross Tucker, a leading sports scientist, explains the advantages biological males have:

Even after hormone therapy, male-born athletes retain significant physical advantages in strength, speed, and endurance.

The numbers do not lie:

– Male athletes typically have 10-30% stronger bones,

– Their lung capacity averages 30-40% greater,

– Heart size and blood volume remain significantly larger, and

– Muscle mass differences persist even after treatment.

The Lia Thomas case opened America’s eyes. But it was not isolated:

– Three Connecticut high school girls lost state championships to biological males,

– A California weightlifter lost her Olympic spot to a transgender competitor, and

– Six state records in women’s track fell to biological males in 2024 alone.

This bill will stop that trend cold.

Twenty-five states did not wait for Congress to act:

– Florida led the charge in 2021. Governor DeSantis signed the first comprehensive protection bill,

– Women’s sports participation increased 12% in states with protections, and

– Not a single lawsuit succeeded in overturning these laws.

President-elect Trump made this a priority.

He declared at an October rally:

We will protect women’s sports

from the radical left’s destruction.

His leadership unified Republicans. Even moderates from the Left started listening to their constituents instead of radical activists.

The bill’s bipartisan support shows its mainstream appeal. Texas Representatives Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez chose protecting women over radical ideology.

They join a growing national movement. Twenty-five states already have similar protections in place. This federal legislation builds on that momentum.

The Senate looks promising. With a 53-47 Republican majority, passage seems likely. President-elect Trump promises an immediate signature.

Athletic organizations are already preparing.

The NCAA will have to abandon its current transgender athlete policy. High schools across America will finally have clear federal guidance.

The Lia Thomas controversy showed why these protections matter. After dominating women’s college swimming, Thomas became the face of this debate.

This bill will prevent such situations while extending an olive branch of confusion categorized as reasonability. At issue: transgender athletes will still be able to train with women’s teams—but that was not their intention from the start. Domination of women’s sports was their warped goal, not participation.

Yes, this bill will preclude biological male participation in biological female competitive sports and biological males taking scholarships from biological females. But allowed participation, for many, seems over the top. Co-ed sports should not be confused with female-only sports—training and competitive involvement. Period.

Americans want their daughters to have real opportunities. They do not want biological advantages to erase decades of progress in women’s sports.

This bill is a start. Perhaps co-ed training will be addressed during the next look at this issue.