The following is an installment of Trump-Vance team accomplishments (each article is linked for further info):
1. Sen. Hawley Introduced Bill to Stop District Judges from Blocking Trump’s Executive Orders
The Missouri Republican announced plans to target federal judges who have repeatedly blocked President Trump’s policy initiatives through nationwide injunctions.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt revealed Trump’s administration has faced 15 separate injunctions in just one month. And these are not minor policy disagreements. Judges have ordered DOGE to cease operations. Another judge blocked Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal aliens, including violent criminals.
Each injunction represents unelected officials overriding presidential authority. Each ruling prevents the administration from implementing the agenda voters endorsed in November.
Hawley declared:
Either the Supreme Court intervene[s] and make[s] clear there’s only one court that can issue rules for the whole country—that’s the Supreme Court. And … if they won’t do that, Congress needs to legislate.
The consequences are real. Border security initiatives stall. Government efficiency programs stop. Criminal aliens remain in American communities. Make no mistake—this judicial overreach affects our safety directly.
The House Judiciary Committee recently advanced legislation from Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) called the “No Rogue Rulings Act.” The bill would amend U.S. Code to limit district courts’ authority to provide nationwide injunctions.
Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) said Republicans would “try to look to pass it on the House floor” while exploring additional legislative remedies.
Senator Hawley’s legislation represents a constitutional approach to restoring proper separation of powers. Rather than attacking individual judges, it addresses the structural problem of nationwide injunctions.
The coming legislative battle is not merely about policy preferences. It is about preserving the constitutional order that has sustained American democracy for over two centuries.
2. SecDef Hegseth: Should We Change the Name of the Department of Defense?
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has taken to his official X account to ask if the Department of Defense should be renamed to the “Department of War.”
Better name?
Have my thoughts…welcome yours. #PeoplesPentagon
— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) March 22, 2025
As of this writing, “Department of War” is winning, 53.6 to 46.4 percent.
This merits some thought. At the founding of the nation, the War Department (originally called the War Office) was one of the very first United States Cabinet departments. It was responsible for oversight of all the armed forces until 1798 when the Navy Department was formed. The War Department was also responsible for all land-based air forces until 1947, when the Department of the Air Force was formed after that branch’s separation into a standalone service, after having been the U.S. Army Air Force. At that time what was left of the War Department was changed to the Department of the Army.
Later that same year, the Department of Defense was created, and given direction over the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, as well as the various national intelligence services—the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office. That is how things stand.
So why change the name back to the War Department – or, as Secretary Hegseth puts it, the “Department of War?”
The primary purpose of our armed forces is indeed war. Large or small, near or far, our armed services are recruited, trained, and equipped to go forth, find bad guys, and permanently change their pronouns to “was” and “were.” Our military members are, above all else, warfighters. There’s an argument to be made for recognizing that in the name.
Elon Musk thinks so:
War is more accurate
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 22, 2025
3. Tom Homan Explains How ICE Will Continue to Deport Illegals Despite Ongoing Litigation (VIDEO)
Border Czar Tom Homan was on ABC’s This Week today and was asked about his comments from earlier in the week on not caring about what judges think about deportations.

Homan defends his comments and explains how ICE will continue deporting illegals despite the ongoing litigation before a federal judge right now.
Click HERE to watch (1:17 min).
4. AG Pam Bondi: Judge Boasberg is “out of control”
Attorney General Pam Bondi was on Fox Business Sunday morning and said that Judge Boasberg is “out of control” and that they are appealing his decisions.
Bondi said that Boasberg is continually dragging them into court and asking for things which he should not be asking because he does not have the authority. She said they will be in court again on Monday.
Click HERE to watch (1:28 min).
5. Trump’s Economic Plan Truly Puts America First
Trump 2.0 means America’s entrepreneur president puts citizens to work, literally. For instance, the latest manufacturing numbers for February show factory jobs just grew by the biggest jump in 15 months.
Unlike his predecessor, who shed manufacturing jobs at a pace of -9,000 jobs per month in 2024, Trump proves the efficacy of his on-shoring approach. Moreover, 93% of the total job gains were in the private sector, rather than budget-busting government bloat positions.
How is Trump achieving this renewal?
By spurring international investment from companies and countries from around the world at a rapid clip, restoring America as a manufacturing powerhouse, and also punishing companies that unnecessarily offshore, especially to adversary nations like China. Smart tariff policies compel job creation at home, for Americans.
Just consider some of the recent headlines: Apple announced a $500 billion investment in the U.S., TSMC, the Taiwanese semiconductor giant, announced a $100 billion investment, Saudi Arabia announced a $600 billion investment.
Economic security is national security.
Also, President Trump insists on full-spectrum energy dominance, centered on abundant American fossil fuels—but he also is committed to an all-of-the-above energy strategy that harnesses renewables. In this emerging economy, a key factor for energy independence and success is battery production.
Biden’s misbegotten (and misnamed) Inflation Reduction Act funneled U.S. taxpayer money into direct aid to Chinese manufacturers of batteries! In fact, China now acts aggressively, in America, to force U.S. reliance on Beijing for the energy technologies of the future.
President Trump rightfully repealed the Obiden Regime’s extreme Electric Vehicle mandates. But concurrently, President Trump can ensure American leadership in future battery technology and prevent lithium-ion batteries from becoming a future leverage industry for China over the US.
The Trump administration works already to protect America’s strategic industries, from semiconductors to medicines. This agenda should also include batteries and should deter joint ventures between U.S. and Chinese companies like the Ford-CATL deal in Michigan. Moreover, US taxpayer dollars should never flow to Chinese companies or to American firms that collaborate with them in our homeland. In addition, federal agencies should be banned from procuring Chinese-made battery systems.
So, support American enterprises while protecting America against the predatory aims of the Chinese regime. With the right America First approach to energy and batteries, the new administration can propel American technology and infrastructure, while defending U.S. national security and economic sovereignty.