When a judge with a gavel can override the votes of tens of millions of Americans, something is terribly wrong with the system established to represent and to govern We the People.
This from thepatriotjournal.com.
All across the country, compromised activist judges have been abusing their oaths of office by turning their courtrooms into mini-legislatures and their benches into thrones.
They are no longer interpreting laws—
they are writing them.
And who are those being negatively affected by these decisions which are obviously being brought about through extortion, blackmail, or greed? Of course, We the American people who voted for President Trump and his agenda. When citizens cast their ballots in 2024, they knew exactly what Trump promised to do about:
– our border crisis,– government in-efficiency, and– national in-security.
However, a handful of judges with lifetime appointments have abusively and unconstitutionally elevated their opinions over the Trump agenda.
In just 65 days of President Trump’s second term, federal judges have issued at least 15 nationwide injunctions blocking his administration’s policies.
NOTE: A single unelected judge in one district can paralyze policies meant for all 50 states.
This is like having a referee who not only calls more than one game at a time but rewrites the rulebook halfway through a contest.
So, what is being accomplished to fight off this judicial coup d’état? House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan is leading the charge with a bold three-pronged strategy to put these black-robed legislators back in their respective constitutional lane.
First up is legislation:
The No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025 would limit the scope of injunctions to the parties in the case and their jurisdiction—not the entire nation.
As Jordan explained:
When you have one of these federal district judges who issues an injunction, you know, some judge in Timbuktu California issues an injunction, it should only apply to parties in the case and in that respective jurisdiction.
The bill would create a new pathway for legitimate nationwide injunctions, requiring challenges from three or more states to be heard by a randomly selected three-judge panel. This ensures that momentous decisions affecting the entire country are not made by a single judge with potential political biases.
The second prong is the power of the purse:
The Constitution gives Congress control over the federal judiciary’s budget. Jordan’s committee is exploring how this appropriations authority can be used to rein in judicial activism.
Finally, there is oversight:
Jordan announced upcoming hearings starting next Tuesday that will put the spotlight on these judicial overreaches.
He stated:
We’ll focus on the injunction issue, but also into this ruling, this order, from Judge Boasberg, which, I mean, just on its face, is so ridiculous.
This is not just about policy disagreements—this is about preserving America’s constitutional foundation. The Founders designed our government with three co-equal branches, each with distinct roles.
When judges make policy decisions that properly belong
to Congress or the Executive, the system breaks down.
Further:
Some Republicans are not waiting for reforms. Representatives like Brandon Gill have filed articles of impeachment against judges they believe have abused their power—specifically, Boasberg. Even President Trump has weighed in, declaring that judges who block his efforts to remove dangerous criminals “should be IMPEACHED!!!”
Jordan’s approach is more measured but no less determined. He is using Congress’s constitutional authority to apply a check and balance to a judiciary that has either forgotten its proper role or is abusively disregarding its proper role. And in so doing, Rep. Jordan is standing up for We the American People whose votes are being nullified by judicial abuse.
