From coast to coast, unconstitutional activist judges have taken it upon themselves to halt, rewrite, and obstruct just about everything President Trump has tried to do.
These robe-clad resistors are less interested in applying the law than they are in blocking America First policies. Apparently, separation of powers is just a suggestion.
This from thepatriotjournal.com.
These judges are not just challenging Trump—they are subverting the very foundations of constitutional governance. They may think they are heroes of the resistance, but rest assured, their day of reckoning is coming. For now, their behavior speaks volumes about how little liberal elites care about the American people.
However, despite these compromised, corrupt judges’ best efforts to sabotage the will of We the Citizenry, President Trump is racking up victory after victory—thanks to a Supreme Court that has been reminded how to read and interpret the Constitution. And all but a few justices who are Kool-Aid drinking idiots, the majority seems to have found their way back to Conservatism. But let us not hold our breaths with anticipation.
From Just The News:
District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of The Obiden Regime]… That sharp rise in universal injunctions stops the Executive Branch from performing its constitutional functions before any courts fully examine the merits of those actions…
Lower-court judges have thrown legal spaghetti at the wall, hoping something sticks. Whether it is pausing deportations, reinstating thousands of underperforming federal workers, or trying to force the return of an alleged MS-13 gang member, activist judges appear increasingly willing to rewrite executive policy from the bench.
Take the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a Salvadoran national flagged for suspected gang ties who was deported under Trump’s reinstated enforcement priorities. A Maryland judge ordered the administration to both “facilitate and effectuate” his return to the United States, despite unclear legal authority and the fact that El Salvador refused to release him. The Supreme Court intervened, staying the lower court’s order and noting the judge’s language “may exceed the District Court’s authority.”
What progressives paint as “authoritarian overreach” is, in reality, the executive branch doing its job. Fortunate for Americans, our system still works—and judges are cautioned their role is not to legislate from the bench.
Since returning to office, President Trump has made heavy use of the DOGE to tear through layers of waste and redundancy. When a California judge froze the administration’s effort to remove thousands of federal employees, SCOTUS stepped in, allowing DOGE to proceed with putting 16,000 underperforming workers on administrative leave.
And there is the ruling from Chief Justice John Roberts that permitted Trump to temporarily fire Obiden-appointed members of two key federal boards: the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. A lower court had tried to block those removals, arguing Trump lacked authority. Roberts’ stay restored basic executive power—something that should not need reminding.
Even in the rare instances where the Supreme Court did not back Trump—like in the 5-4 ruling forcing the release of frozen USAID funds—conservative justices issued scathing dissents. Justice Samuel Alito captured the mood, having written:
The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.
Stunned is putting it lightly.
Aside from court victories, the Trump administration is scoring big wins behind the scenes—squeezing waste out of bloated agencies and shining a light on dysfunctional spending.
Thanks to DOGE’s aggressive audits and reforms, the Trump-Vance team has already saved taxpayers over $150 billion. That is despite repeated legal attempts to block access to Treasury Department data—attempts that have largely failed or been reversed.
One federal judge initially barred DOGE employee Ryan Wunderly from accessing key financial systems used to chase down fraud. After pushback and procedural corrections, the judge backtracked—allowing Wunderly limited access after undergoing standard training. Elon Musk did not hold back, blasting the original ruling as “absolutely insane” and warning that “something super shady is going to protect scammers.”
Looks like the Swamp was hoping to keep its secrets. Fortunately for our beloved country, We the People elected a president willing to rip the curtain down.
God speed to the Trump-Vance team.
