Wednesday Morning Breakfast For The Brain

Just one more day to get up that hill and then we’re on the downside…

Hillary’s Mouth

By Ben Garrison

Hillary won’t be running for president in 2020, but she is not going away.

She said she plans to take an active role and work with the Democrat candidates who are running. She wants to help. How nice of her!

What she really wants is to continue to exercise power and control over the Democrat Party. She wants to rig the primaries in favor of her chosen candidate. One that will do her bidding. As contemptible as they are, the Clintons still control their party and they have an enormous amount of money, thanks to their corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Hillary stole primary elections away from Bernie without any repercussions whatsoever, so naturally she’ll do it again for her chosen candidate. She’ll get to stay in the limelight and continue to spew lies and empty platitudes all along the way.

This could also be a way for her to hobble any front runner to make it easier and sensible for her to step in at the last moment and claim she was forced to run after all, because the leading candidate, probably a socialist, would have no chance against Trump.

This would be true, but Hillary has no chance, either. She has already complained that she’s never seen the country so divided. This means she might step forward and offer herself as a reasonable, ‘centrist’ Democrat, but in actuality Hillary has been a major part of the polarization by paying for a fake dossier to get the FBI to spy on Trump.

Hillary is part of the ongoing coup against a lawfully elected president.

Lock her up.

Check out all of Ben’s awesome cartoons and commentary HERE.

The Democrats’ Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism Is A Transparent Joke

Via The Federalist

It’s worth remembering that it was only after a handful of Jewish Democrats like Eliot Engel objected to Omar’s comments that Pelosi was forced to act—or, rather, pretend to act. Even now, a number of pundits on the left, including columnists for the Washington Post and The Atlantic, argue that Omar—as well as fellow anti-Semite Rep. Rashida Tlaib—operate within the parameters of acceptable debate. Or take The New York Times’ alleged anti-Semitism expert, Jonathan Weisman, who’s seemingly never met a leftist Jew-hater he won’t defend. Then again, his newspaper has a rich history on this front. Omar could read portions of the Hamas Charter into the congressional record, and The New York Times would tell us her “latest remarks on Israel draw criticism.”

Another tactic taken up by Democrats, I’ve noticed, is trolling for supposedly anti-Semitic comments by Republicans to deflect and dilute the attention on Omar. On Monday Democrats found one such strawman, when the ranking member of the oversight committee, Jim Jordan, spelled liberal donor Tom Steyer’s name with a dollar sign in a tweet. Liberals across the media quickly took up the cause: “Gee whiz, what if Ilhan Omar had done this?!” Well, if Omar had inserted a dollar sign into the name of a supposedly Jewish donor, considering her history, we’d have to assume she’d was clumsily trying to make another bigoted comment.

But, generally speaking, there’s absolutely nothing anti-Semitic about pointing out that Steyer, and other activist billionaires, spends millions every cycle helping political causes. Steyer, perhaps more than any other activist in the nation, in fact, is known for advocating for the impeachment of Donald Trump. So when House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler issued document requests from more than 80 people and organizations in a massive trolling investigation for “obstruction,” Jordan reacted, as people in both political parties have always reacted, accusing the other party of being bought by a big donors and special interests.

Read the entire article HERE.

Democrats Search For A Crime To Punish Trump And Americans Who Voted For Him

By Sara Carter

The House Judiciary Committee’s Democratic Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler is a man in search of a crime. Nadler and his colleague House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff have moved the conversation from Russian collusion and are now promising to investigate virtually everything connected to President Donald Trump.

Mind you, we the taxpayers will be paying for these investigations and it will drag America and the administration into another two years of endless witch hunts.

Yes, a witch-hunt.

Can you imagine if someone despised you so much that all they did day in and day out was search for something, anything, that would get those around you to doubt your intentions. Imagine having to fight every single day of your life against never ending accusations. Even when those accusations are later proven false it won’t matter because the original lie has already been thoroughly disseminated far and wide among the population.

Why are Nadler, D-NY, and Schiff, D-CA, promising these investigations? Because they want to impeach Trump. It’s just that simple. They also want to send a message to the American people: your vote really didn’t matter because in the end it’s Congress that holds the power.

Read the entire article HERE.

Sanders Fills Ranks With Anti-Israel Advocates Tied to Anti-Semitism Scandal

Via The Washington Free Beacon

Two of Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I., Vt.) top advisers have deep ties to the anti-Israel community and were chastised several years ago for their involvement in an anti-Semitism scandal that gripped a prominent Washington, D.C., think-tank.

Sanders, a self-proclaimed Democratic-socialist who has once again thrown his hat into the ring for a 2020 presidential bid, has begun to rely in recent months on two staffers: Foreign policy adviser Matt Duss and campaign manager Faiz Shakir, both of whom faced charges of promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories during their time at the Center for American Progress, or CAP, a liberal think-tank.

Sanders’s dependence on Duss and Shakir has been making waves in the pro-Israel and Jewish community in recent months, given the duo’s prominent role in CAP’s 2012 anti-Semitism row, which saw several staffers at the organization’s Think Progress blog rebuked for invoking age-old canards about Jewish control of money and politics. Duss has faced additional scrutiny in the subsequent years for publishing Nazi-era propaganda posters and steadfastly standing against the U.S.-Israel alliance

As the matter of anti-Jewish bias in prominent D.C. political circles makes its way back into the news following a series of anti-Semitic comments by freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.), many in the pro-Israel community are beginning to raise questions about Sanders’ choice to fill his ranks with individuals closely tied to some of the most prominent anti-Israel causes.

Read the entire article HERE.

’60 Minutes’ Touts Radical-Left Kiddie Crusade to End Fossil Fuels

Via Newsbusters

The liberal media warn us of creeping authoritarianism, and democracy dying in darkness. But what about when radical leftists sue the government demanding an end to fossil fuels? Demanding that Congress and the White House be overruled by judges when then block the radical left? On Sunday night’s 60 Minutes on CBS, Obama-loving Steve Kroft put together 13 minutes of one-sided propaganda that began like this:

STEVE KROFT: Of all the cases working in their way through the federal court system, none is more interesting or potentially more life-changing than Juliana vs. the United States. To quote one federal judge, “This is no ordinary lawsuit.” It was filed back in 2015 on behalf of a group of kids who are trying to get the courts to block the U.S. government from continuing the use of fossil fuels. They say it’s causing climate change, endangering their future and violating their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property.

When the lawsuit began, hardly anyone took it seriously, including the government’s lawyers, who have since watched the Supreme Court reject two of their motions to delay or dismiss the case. Four years in, it is still very much alive, in part because the plaintiffs have amassed a body of evidence that will surprise even the skeptics and have forced the government to admit that the crisis is real.

In addition to interviewing three young plaintiffs, Kroft gave large chunks of air time to leftist litigator Julia Olson, who claims the government has completely cried uncle and admitted to her argument that the world is in great peril from climate change and has known this for 50 years.

Read the entire article HERE.

Be sure to subscribe to Def-Con News to get Breakfast For The Brain in your morning mailbox.