Stacey Abrams Blames Her Lack Of Appeal on Racism

Stacey Abrams lost the election for Georgia governor last year and she still hasn’t conceded because of “racism.” She has now set her sights on losing a bid for the White House, which she will also blame on racism. Amazingly enough, she also blames racism for the reason why no one is excited to see her run for president. She’s going to do it anyways, just to prove how damn racist everyone is.

Abrams appeared on CBS This Morning to shoot down any rumors she may be joining Joe Biden as his VP candidate:

“I think you don’t run for second place. If I’m going to enter a primary, then I’m going to enter a primary,” said Abrams.

She ran for second place in Georgia last year. If she enters the democratic primaries, she’ll actually be running for 12th place, but whatever.

And of entering the crowded democratic field, it appears Abrams is in:

“I will say the presidency wasn’t top of mind to begin with, but I think the success I had in our election, transforming the electorate, the work I’ve done as a business leader, as a civic leader, as a political leader, positions me to be just as capable of becoming the president of the United States as anyone running,” Abrams said.

She can’t even win governor of Georgia. How is she capable of getting the Democratic Party nomination and then winning the presidency? Also, did you notice how she talked about all of the “success” she had in losing Georgia?

“My responsibility, though, is to make sure I’m running for the right reasons and at the right time,” said Abrams.

I think it’s pretty clear she intends to announce her candidacy any day now. The only problem Abrams has is that thanks to racism, people aren’t super-stoked to see her run. She went on MSNBC and laid out her case. When asked why liberals are excited about Beto O’Rourke, who is white, and not her or fellow black person Andrew Gillum, this was her response:

“I don’t think that success is zero sum, so I don’t want to disparage or take away from the reaction and the legitimate response people had to his campaign, but I do want to call the question. There is no difference — there is no distinction with a difference between what he accomplished and what Andrew and I accomplished. I would challenge people to consider why we were not lifted up in the same way,” Abrams said.

Beto O’Rourke, Andrew Gillum, and Stacey Abrams all lost. Liberals sure do define accomplishment and success in weird way, don’t they?

Now wait for it…

“I think race plays a part. I think region plays a part. I also think phenotype plays a part. My responsibility is to investigate running for president because I want people to understand I may not look like the typical candidate, but that does not diminish my responsibility to run for the job,” Abrams said.

I’m sorry, did she just say that people aren’t as excited about her candidacy because of her phenotype? Read what that means here. This chick is crazier than I thought and I had her up there with the kookiest of liberals.

Also, what religion is she? Isn’t she a Christian like almost every other democrat running in 2020? Maybe this is her way of saying she’s a secret Muslim or possibly a Scientologist. She thinks the way she makes bird’s nests is one of the reasons why people don’t like her as much as Beta O’Dork, so she’s definitely nuts enough to be any of those fringe religions.

The cool thing about Abrams running for president is that no matter what, she can just claim she won. After getting no delegates in the democratic primaries, she can simply declare herself the party’s nominee. Then, in the general election after winning no states or any measurable votes, she can say that she is the legitimate President of the United States. She’ll make history as the first black female president as well as the only person to simultaneously be POTUS and Governor of Georgia.