Home
Eric Swalwell Justifies Gun Confiscation With Claim That British Never Tried To Disarm Colonists

Eric Swalwell Justifies Gun Confiscation With Claim That British Never Tried To Disarm Colonists

California Rep. Eric Swalwell wants to disarm the American people under threat of nuclear retaliation for non-compliance. This is a little more extreme than what the British tried to do to the American colonists, touching off the Revolutionary War, but similar. According to the democrat however, the British never tried to disarm the people so it’s okay if he does it. I guess if he’s going to ignore the US Constitution, he might as well ignore US History too.

Swalwell announced his candidacy for president in 2020 this week and plans on running an exclusively gun control campaign:

Liberals think “buy back” sounds less totalitarian than “confiscation” but they are the same thing. Boston College Lecturer-In-Law Elliott Hamilton saw Swalwell’s plan to disarm Americans and was mortified:

Now get ready for Swalwell’s intelligence mature response:

Really? he’s saying that the British never tried to disarm the colonists? What explains this thing from The History Channel?

The Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought on April 19, 1775, kicked off the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). Tensions had been building for many years between residents of the 13 American colonies and the British authorities, particularly in Massachusetts. On the night of April 18, 1775, hundreds of British troops marched from Boston to nearby Concord in order to seize an arms cache. Paul Revere and other riders sounded the alarm, and colonial militiamen began mobilizing to intercept the Redcoat column. A confrontation on the Lexington town green started off the fighting, and soon the British were hastily retreating under intense fire. Many more battles followed, and in 1783 the colonists formally won their independence.

Weird, huh? It’s almost like Swalwell doesn’t know what the f*ck he’s talking about. I don’t know about you, but I expected more from a guy who wants to take are guns away and nuke those of us who dissent.

The Revolutionary War was fought and the US was established because the colonists wanted their independence from the tyrannical King of England. The major reasons leading up to the war were unfair taxes levied by King George and the suppression of basic human rights including gun ownership.

Actually, that sounds kind of familiar, doesn’t it? Democrats want to tax the shit out of us and take away our right to keep and bear arms. Democrats are exactly the same as the British. In reality, democrats are much bigger threat to our freedom and liberty than the British ever were.

We kicked the hell out those Red Coats in 1776 and there’s no reason why we shouldn’t do the same thing to democrats now. And that brings us back to Eric Swalwell who tried to clarify his plan to disarm us:

His actual plan is to ban what he thinks are assault rifles and then force people to turn them in. When he says “dangerous weapons” he means normal semi-automatic firearms that he thinks look scary and that operate no differently than any other semi-automatic firearm. When he says “dangerous people” he means everyone. His ban and confiscation scheme doesn’t differentiate between criminals, who are already banned from owning firearms, and law-abiding people.

Swalwell isn’t running for President of the United States, he’s running for King of the Americas and would like to impose complete control on his subjects. It won’t happen because of all that history and Constitutional law that he apparently knows nothing about. Also, he’s a complete douche that even democrats hate, so he won’t make it out of the primaries.