The liberal media (and Hillary Clinton) went with a false narrative for the past two and half years that Donald Trump and the Russian government colluded to influence the 2016 election, robbing Hillary of the presidency. That’s been debunked a thousand times but liberals can’t let go of the lie. As it turns out, there was collusion to influence the election and it was between Hillary and Google who managed to flip anywhere between 2-10 million undecided voters in favor of Clinton. It’s amazing that she still managed to lose, isn’t it?
Based on research from Dr. Robert Epstein, Trump sent out this tweet:
Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! @JudicialWatch
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2019
Which caused Hillary to lose her shit:
The debunked study you’re referring to was based on 21 undecided voters. For context that’s about half the number of people associated with your campaign who have been indicted. https://t.co/0zHnWvGjSv
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 19, 2019
Now here’s where things get funny. Epstein took the time to fact-check Hillary’s hysterical reaction:
I’m a big #Hillary supporter, BUT… my 2016 monitoring findings were based on an analysis of 13,207 election-related searches, along with the 98,044 web pages to which the search results linked. The pro-Hillary bias was significant at the .001 level. See https://t.co/EQc8vanmJ0
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
Also, sorry #Hillary (I’m a fan, so I really hate correcting you), BUT… to my knowledge no credible authority has ever “debunked” either my 2016 and 2018 election monitoring projects or my controlled studies on internet influence. See https://t.co/77dW74wlFY
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
Also, when the CEO of #Google testified before Congress in Dec. 2018 that “we take issue with Epstein’s methodology,” that was hardly a “debunking.” Monitoring systems are our only true protection against Big Tech. Please see: https://t.co/1eyxrUuFeB
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
.@HillaryClinton, whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. As a result, I have been subjected to widespread condemnation by mainstream media. I’m going to fight this. Stay tuned tomorrow for my first-ever twitter storm. pic.twitter.com/CrPHMycVBu
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
And the fact-check got even worse for Hillary:
Now, switching to .@HillaryClinton: This is going to hurt me to write, because I & my whole extended family have been strong supporters of the Clintons for decades. I have a framed, signed letter from #Bill on the wall near my desk. But #Hillary should be ashamed of herself. pic.twitter.com/FKyLiKonyw
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
@HillaryClinton said that my 2016 election monitoring project has been “debunked” & was “based on 21 undecided voters.” Both assertions are false, & both came from #Google. To understand what’s going on here, you need to know about the relationship between #Hillary & #Google.” pic.twitter.com/NqaWhko205
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
#Hillary has long depended on #Google for both money & votes. Her largest donor in 2016 was Alphabet/Google. Her Chief Technology Officer during the campaign was Stephanie Hannon, a former Google exec. And then there’s #EricSchmidt, longtime head of Google – the guy in the pic: pic.twitter.com/dSV8wOPwAH
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
A leaked email showed that in 2014 #Google‘s #EricSchmidt offered to run #Hillary‘s tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office. https://t.co/rXMNH9bLYV pic.twitter.com/MRjGpCJcvr
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
Epstein said that his research showed that Google’s pro-Hillary bias was enough to get anywhere from 2.6 to 10.4 million undecided voters to vote for her. Considering that Hillary won the popular vote by around 3 million votes, it’s safe to say that without interference she would have lost that too.
Here’s my question: Robert Mueller indicted a bunch of Russians for placing silly ads on social media in the lead-up to the 2016 election, so why didn’t he also indict Google? There is no proof that Russian ads had any influence on people, but here’s compelling evidence that Google flipped millions of voters in favor of Hillary.
If it was a threat to democracy when democrats thought Trump colluded with the Russians, shouldn’t it be a bigger threat that Google colluded with Hillary to influence the election?
Another good question is, how will the government stop Google form doing the same thing in 2020? It’s obvious that the big tech companies are biased against conservatives and straight-up hate President Trump.
The only real problem I have with Dr. Epstein’s explanation is that he says Hillary should be ashamed of herself. he obviously knows her so he should be aware that she has no shame.
With this new information, let’s revisit Hillary’s 2016 campaign: She had the liberal media and Hollywood on her side, she spent $1 billion dollars, and got Google to deliver her millions of votes and still managed to blow it. I think that’s a testament to how truly awful she is.