Democrats never serve up a nothing-burger without a side of fiction fries and a medium dubious claim drink. It’s called the “Liberal Happy Meal” which is ironic considering how sad it is. With their efforts to impeach President Trump hinging on a suspect whistleblower complaint falling apart, the democrats have miraculously found a couple more whistleblowers to perpetuate their fantasy. What are the chances?
Democrats in the House are trying to impeach President Trump based on an anonymous whistleblower complaint falsely claiming he tried to extort the Ukraine to help his 2020 reelection efforts. This fairy tale has already been exposed as a fraud since Trump released all pertinent information related to it, but there’s a bigger issue: the whistleblower has been revealed to be an anti-Trump democratic operative who was coached by House Intelligence Committee head Rep. Adam Schiff in filing this fraudulent complaint.
This sham impeachment inquiry and whistleblower complaint has zero credibility. Actually it has less than zero credibility because it’s something that democrats concocted to unjustly remove the freely-elected President of the United States from office.
The democrats didn’t spend all of this time and effort to frame President Trump a second time only to have it fall apart, so they’ve implanted phase 2 of the set-up as reported by Fox News:
A second whistleblower claiming to have information regarding President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has come forward, and has already spoken to the intelligence community’s inspector general.
Attorney Mark Zaid, who represents both whistleblowers, [said] that the second individual is – like the first whistleblower – an intelligence official, and has firsthand knowledge of certain allegations contained in the first whistleblower complaint, which was not based on any firsthand knowledge. Andrew Bakaj, managing partner of the firm handling the case, verified the existence of the new whistleblower Sunday morning.
“I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General,” said Bakaj.
If this second whistleblower has first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing on the President’s part, why didn’t he or she file the whistleblower complaint instead of the person with the secondhand information? That’s a pretty easy question to answer: because this 2nd whistleblower doesn’t have any damning evidence. This is that side of fiction fries to go along with the nothing burger the democrats already served up.
But wait, you a get a drink with that, so as The Hill reports, there’s a 3rd whistleblower in a completely unrelated matter:
A whistleblower allegation about possible misconduct in the IRS presidential tax-return audit program is receiving new attention amid House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into President Trump.
Its existence was first revealed by the Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee in court documents in August in its lawsuit for Trump’s tax returns. In an Aug. 8 letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin included in a filing, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) said his panel received information from a federal employee on July 29 that included credible allegations of “inappropriate efforts to influence” the IRS mandatory program of auditing presidents and vice presidents.
The Washington Post reported Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter, that the whistleblower is an IRS employee who said he was told that at least one Treasury Department political appointee tried to interfere with an audit of Trump or Vice President Pence’s tax returns.
Hey, look at that. More secondhand information. This IRS whistleblower complaint is even dumber because…
It’s IRS internal policy, but not law, to conduct annual audits of the president’s and vice president’s tax returns.
…even if the complaint is true, it not anything that is illegal or unethical.
What makes this ploy truly pathetic is that the democrats tried this exact same thing with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh last year and it failed spectacularly: First they roll out a partisan hack with an unsubstantiated and easy-to-discredit allegation and when that goes to hell, suddenly there are more accusers with even less credible claims. Phase 3 of this ruse is when “Creepy Porn Lawyer” Michael Avenatti get’s involved and that’s probably coming this week.
The only thing that makes any sense is that the democrats had a two-for-one coupon on their “Liberal Happy Meal” and they didn’t want it to go to waste. The real meal they are serving up is a big shit sandwich that they will all eventually have to eat themselves.
