Served up a bit late this morning and definitely not sunny side up.
Dem Governor Accuses Trump Of Inciting Domestic Rebellion https://t.co/yME00P6z1z
— MAGA News Report (@MagaNewsReport) April 18, 2020
Dem Governor Accuses Trump Of Inciting Domestic Rebellion
By Chris Donaldson/Trending Politics
Governor Jay Inslee accused President Trump of inciting violence over a series of tweets that were critical of states that enacted punishing measures during the coronavirus pandemic.
The far-left overlord of Washington State was triggered by a series of tweets from the POTUS calling for the liberation of three states whose governors have enacted draconian lockdowns against their citizens.
LIBERATE MICHIGAN!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 17, 2020
LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 17, 2020
According to a statement issued by the failed Dem presidential candidate:
“The president’s statements this morning encourage illegal and dangerous acts. He is putting millions of people in danger of contracting COVID-19. His unhinged rantings and calls for people to “liberate” states could also lead to violence. We’ve seen it before.
“The president is fomenting domestic rebellion and spreading lies even while his own administration says the virus is real and is deadly, and that we have a long way to go before restrictions can be lifted.”
The coronavirus pandemic has been a godsend to Democrat governors who have used the opportunity to implement totalitarian measures over the states that they rule.
Since mid-March, Americans who have the misfortune of living in one of the states or cities presided over by petty tyrants have seen their constitutional rights stripped, put under de facto house arrest and been subjected to arbitrary laws.
The worst have been in Michigan under Gov. Gretchen Whitmer who has banned the sale of garden plants and seeds and in Virginia where Gov. Ralph Northam aka “Coonman” has used the crisis to severely curtail 2nd Amendment rights.
Inslee found a sympathetic ear on pro-China propaganda network CNN where he whined to multimillionaire anchor Wolf Blitzer.
WA Gov. Jay Inslee on Trump's tweets: "This is just grossly irresponsible and it is dangerously bombastic because it inspires people to do dangerous things." https://t.co/Sx7qtCw8VP pic.twitter.com/qrWRC39fW6
— The Hill (@thehill) April 18, 2020
Via The Hill, “Inslee accuses Trump of ‘fomenting domestic rebellion'”:
Jay Inslee, Washington state’s Democratic governor, sharply criticized President Trump on Friday for appearing to endorse those protesting coronavirus stay-at-home orders, accusing him of “fomenting domestic rebellion.”
Inslee issued a statement asserting that Trump both encouraged “illegal and dangerous acts” and put millions in danger of being infected with the novel coronavirus by issuing tweets earlier Friday that seemed to back the protests.
“The president is fomenting domestic rebellion and spreading lies even while his own administration says the virus is real and is deadly, and that we have a long way to go before restrictions can be lifted,” Inslee said.
Inslee, with whom Trump has traded barbs in the past, also insisted that Trump’s “irresponsible statements” undermined the work of members of his own coronavirus task force, including Vice President Pence, Deborah Birx and Adm. Brett Giroir.
“The president’s call to action today threatens to undermine his own goal of recovery by further delaying the ability of states to amend current interventions in a safe, evidence-based way,” Inslee said.
“His words are likely to cause COVID-19 infections to spike in places where social distancing is working — and if infections are increasing in those places, that will further postpone the 14 days of decline that his own guidance says is necessary before modifying any interventions,” he continued.
With the media stoking an atmosphere of mass hysteria and the majority of the nation under indefinite home detention, people are starting to revolt over being stomped on by the big blue Democrat jackboot.
"Operation Gridlock": Thousands protest Michigan governor's lockdown order https://t.co/OZbpnO8KY5
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) April 16, 2020
Little tin gods like Inslee and his ilk are becoming increasingly restive that enough angry Americans will reject their real-life preview of what it’s like to live under communist rule and kick their asses out of the positions of power that they have abused.
Democrats who are determined to keep the lockdowns in place as a gesture of defiance against Trump are playing with fire and the backlash is coming.
We need to get these flying again… pic.twitter.com/OgZFc7XHd5
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) April 17, 2020
Read the entire article HERE.
Curtis Ellis: If you tried to design an attack against the president’s supporters, you couldn’t do better than what the experts have done in the name of public health. https://t.co/1WmpwJsreu
— American Greatness (@theamgreatness) April 16, 2020
Are We Witnessing a Targeted Hit Against Trump Voters?
Via American Greatness
If you tried to design an attack against the president’s supporters, you couldn’t do better than what the experts have done in the name of public health.
The debate about “reopening the economy” is a phony debate.
It’s phony because “the economy” isn’t shut down. Far from it. Walmart is still open. Dollar General is open. Amazon is open. Alibaba is open.
It just so happens that the big-box mass merchandisers and online retailers responsible for flooding our country with crap from Communist China are open.
Meanwhile, other, very specific parts of the country are shut down.
Family-owned shops and workshops, the backbone of America, are closed. Fast-food franchises remain open—drive-through windows are operating at full tilt—but independently owned restaurants are shuttered or trying to survive at diminished capacity doing takeout only.
Conveniently, if not coincidentally, small-business owners make up an important segment of Trump’s base. Like the president, they have signed the front of a paycheck, experienced the brunt of the well-meaning administrative state, and endured the predations of giant corporations and subsidized Chinese competition. That’s why they love President Trump–he understands what they go through.
While these largely family-owned, small and medium-sized enterprises are laying off workers by the millions, Amazon and Walmart are hiring.
In the energy industry, the big guys can weather the storm while small, independent producers are getting crushed as oil prices fall off the cliff along with demand.
Facebook, Twitter, Google, Zoom and other giant internet overlords are seeing more traffic than ever as people are locked in and white-collar professionals work from home.
These are the same people in Silicon Valley who tilt hard to the left and censor anyone who strays from the official “we are all going to die” pandemic narrative.
Twitter gives a soapbox to Chinese Communist Party propagandists suggesting the U.S. Army hatched the coronavirus but bans Laura Ingraham for daring to suggest an FDA-approved drug could offer hope to the stricken.
Who else isn’t shut down?
Government employees continue to draw paychecks, even those deemed “nonessential.”
Let us pause for a moment to consider just how ridiculous this is: Show me a private business that pays a “nonessential” employee even in the best of times. In the real world, outside of government, if you’re not essential you’re not on the payroll (unless you’re married to the boss’s daughter).
The “creative class” of the coastal elites, academics, media and the white-collar professionals of the urban centers remain employed—and paid—while blue-collar Americans are furloughed, laid off, and deemed “nonessential.”
There’s a certain symmetry to this.
Americans who work with their hands and live outside the big blue cities are considered “nonessential.” Families who own their businesses, or work for a family business rather than depend on the government or a global corporation for their livelihoods are considered “nonessential.” People who want to go to church rather than an abortion clinic are considered “nonessential.”
Before these Americans were called “nonessential” they were called “deplorable.”
Read the entire article HERE.
Public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from projects proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition + economic development + serves Gates philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.https://t.co/3OxY68nax2
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) April 10, 2020
Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination
By Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.
Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.
In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.
In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
‘South African newspapers complained, ‘We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.’
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.
Read the entire article HERE.
This Spiky Patch Could Invisibly Record Vaccination History Under Skin – But the technology raise several ethical concerns that could stymie its progress — With comments from our Nancy Kass | #Bioethics via @SmithsonianMag https://t.co/4wlMUq6fPX
— Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (@bermaninstitute) December 18, 2019
This Spiky Patch Could Invisibly Record Vaccination History Under Skin
Via Smithsonian Magazine
The human body is an extraordinary record keeper. Tattooed into its skin are the scars of old wounds; archived in the molecules of the immune system are the traces of past infections.
But when that history gets translated into written medical records, things can quickly get dicey. Every lost sheet of paper or inaccurately tallied statistic can raise a person’s risk of receiving inadequate care—an especially pressing issue in low- and middle-income countries, where health care resources are often scarce or inaccessible.
The consequences go far beyond a missed injection: Inconsistent recordkeeping is thought to play a large role in the 1.5 million deaths that occur due to undervaccination each year.
Now, a team led by MIT scientists has come forward with a bold proposition that could write a legible vaccination history back into the body’s repertoire. Solving medicine’s record-keeping riddle, they argue, might just involve injecting patterns of invisible nanoparticles under the skin. Like QR codes, these designs could be scanned and interpreted by smartphones, and someday allow health providers to archive and access patients’ past vaccinations without the muss and fuss of external records.
The tattoo-esque technology, described today in the journal Science Translational Medicine, is still in the early stages of development, and hasn’t yet been tested in humans. But the team’s experiments in rats suggest that these medical marks are both safe and long-lasting, and can be administered alongside vaccines without compromising efficacy.
If the team’s research progresses, future efforts will focus on delivering the technology to children in low- and middle-income countries, where many still rely on paper cards or certificates to track their vaccination history. But other experts caution that both technical and ethical hurdles might stymie its implementation—including in places where new tools to combat the spread of disease are needed most.
“Figuring out how to keep better track of vaccination is incredibly important from a health systems and public health perspective,” says Johns Hopkins University bioethicist Nancy Kass, who wasn’t involved in the project. But injectable nanoparticles that reveal private information about a patient “could be ripe for misinterpretations and rumors,” she says. That’s especially true given the fraught history of vaccination in countries at all socioeconomic strata, including the United States.
With similar concerns in mind, the researchers, led by bioengineers Robert Langer and Ana Jaklenec, are preparing to conduct surveys to assess whether the invisible tattoos would be accepted by locals in high-priority regions. Backed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, interviews in Malawi, Bangladesh, Benin and Kenya will begin early next year.
“We want people to be comfortable,” says study author Kevin McHugh, a bioengineer at Rice University. “The goal is widespread adoption.”
Though somewhat comparable to tattoos, the marks themselves are nothing like traditional ink. Delivered by a microneedle patch—a four-by-four grid of tiny, 1.5-millimeter-long spikes that hurt less than typical injections—they’re made up of nanoparticles that are undetectable in visible light, glowing only when viewed in infrared.
Over the course of two minutes, the nanoparticles diffuse from within the microneedles to a shallow layer of skin, where they’re deposited in simple patterns of dots, each smaller than your garden-variety freckle. The patch is then removed, leaving behind a subtle mark that can still be imaged after being exposed to the equivalent of five years’ worth of sunlight, the team’s experiments show.
Read the entire article HERE.
The New York Times was working overtime to defend Bill Gates and the World Health Organization from criticism. https://t.co/ijWM59xB1a
— MediaResearchCenter (@theMRC) April 18, 2020
NY Times BELCHES Propaganda Defending Bill Gates and World Health Organization
Via Newsbusters
The liberal New York Times devoted two stories between Apr. 15 and Apr. 17, attacking President Donald Trump’s decision to freeze funding to the World Health Organization.
The effort attempted to insulate one of the president’s biggest liberal critics on the matter from conservative scrutiny: billionaire Microsoft Co-Founder Bill Gates.
The Times piece published Apr. 17 and headlined, “Bill Gates, at Odds With Trump on Virus, Becomes a Right-Wing Target,” grumbled Gates “has effectively assumed the role occupied by George Soros, the billionaire financier and Democratic donor who has been a villain for the right.” NPR reported that the U.S. had pledged $656 million to the W.H.O. for the “two-year budget cycle of 2018 and 2019,” which is less than 1 percent of Gates’s estimated net worth.
The Times included this tweet from Gates, who lambasted Trump’s policy move:
Halting funding for the World Health Organization during a world health crisis is as dangerous as it sounds. Their work is slowing the spread of COVID-19 and if that work is stopped no other organization can replace them. The world needs @WHO now more than ever.
— Bill Gates (@BillGates) April 15, 2020
The Times piece spent the first seven paragraphs pushing red herrings to make it appear Gates is under an “explosion of conspiracy theories.” The Times said these theories were being peddled by “[a]nti-vaccinators, members of the conspiracy group QAnon and right-wing pundits” before pivoting to Gates’s half-baked shot at the White House. The paper claimed “Misinformation about Mr. Gates is now the most widespread of all coronavirus falsehoods,” according to its summary of media analysis taken from the company Zignal Labs.
The paper first propped up Gates as “the latest” to “be ensnared in the flow of right-wing punditry that has denigrated those who appear at odds with Mr. Trump on the virus.” It then proceeded to boast about the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s philanthropic efforts.
Those efforts included distributing “vaccines in developing countries” and advocating “family planning through greater use of contraceptives.” The Times used the list to claim that “those efforts have prompted unfounded accusations that Mr. Gates was hurting the world’s poor with unnecessary drugs and harmful crops while trying to suppress the global population.”
The Times ignored that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had funneled at least $11,381,171 to the over-population-focused Population Council between 2018-2020 alone. It has also given at least $81,009,329 to abortion giant Planned Parenthood and its affiliates from 2009 and before to 2018.
The other piece “Urged On by Conservatives and His Own Advisers, Trump Targeted the W.H.O.” was plastered on the front page of The Times Apr. 16, print edition. It blamed Trump’s W.H.O. decision on “a concerted conservative campaign against the group.” It arbitrarily attacked Fox News, Republican lawmakers and former Trump strategist Stephen K. Bannon as part of the effort.
Read the entire article HERE.
BIG BROTHER: Facebook Will Issue Warnings to Users Who ‘Like’ Unapproved Coronavirus Information https://t.co/pecRY71oUr
— Big League Politics (@bigleaguepol) April 18, 2020
BIG BROTHER: Facebook Will Issue Warnings to Users Who ‘Like’ Unapproved Coronavirus Information
Via Big League Politics
Facebook is in overdrive working to prevent all coronavirus information from being disseminated that isn’t congruent with the globalist narrative, and they are going to start punishing users who like unapproved coronavirus stories on their platform.
Any user who has clicked on, reacted to, or shared a post arbitrarily deemed false by Facebook’s truth commission will receive a demerit. They will then be directed to resources from the World Health Organization (WHO) featuring globalist propaganda about the crisis.
WHO’s information has been notoriously unreliable throughout the pandemic, and they have carried water for the Chinese communist regime responsible for causing the global crisis.
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China🇨🇳. pic.twitter.com/Fnl5P877VG
— World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) January 14, 2020
“Through this crisis, one of my top priorities is making sure that you see accurate and authoritative information across all of our apps,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook post on Thursday.
Google and Twitter are also following suit and instituting similar restrictions to prevent the flow of information. Big Tech is desperately trying to control the narrative to keep the fear ratcheted up so the public will mindlessly obey.
The professional fact checkers and left-wing special interest groups are applauding Facebook’s steps to restrict the flow of information and enact Orwellian content controls.
“It’s a big indicator that people are trusting the fact checkers,” said Baybars Orsek, the director of the International Fact-Checking Network, about Facebook’s claims that their warnings stop 95 percent of users from clicking unapproved items on the platform. “The label has an impact on people’s information consumption.”
Avaaz, a Soros-funded special interest group that regularly pushes for digital censorship, believes that Facebook needs to do even more to crush the flow of information casting doubt on the approved establishment narrative.
“Coronavirus misinformation content mutates and spreads faster than Facebook’s current system can track it,” Avaaz said in its report.
Read the entire article HERE.
CBC Instructs Kids on How to Shut Down Their Parents’ “Conspiracy Theories” https://t.co/tx00tdc8oZ pic.twitter.com/Wig1rX7NOe
— Blacklisted News (@BlacklistedNews) April 17, 2020
CBC Instructs Kids on How to Shut Down Their Parents’ “Conspiracy Theories”
Via Blacklisted News
A CBC News report gives kids advice on how to shut down “conspiracy theories” voiced by their parents about coronavirus being created by China in a lab.
Because apparently that’s the media’s job now.
The presenter laments how somebody’s Dad may drop a message into chat blaming China for “manufacturing the coronavirus” with a “link to a site you’ve never heard of” (translation – a link that’s not, God forbid, mainstream media).
The piece then features a woman from a group that combats “misinformation online” who urges the son or daughter not to get confrontational with their Dad but to accuse him of being accurate and stirring fear.
At one point in the piece, the reporter even suggests that conspiracy theories can be “just as dangerous as a virus.”
“Maybe send an article from a legitimate source quoting credible scientists on why the virus wasn’t manufactured,” states the host.
The suggested article unsurprisingly comes from the CBC and is entitled ‘No, the new coronavirus wasn’t created in a lab, scientists say.’
In reality, as Fox News sources confirmed last night, the coronavirus was indeed leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, so to say it was “manufactured” isn’t even much of a stretch. The virus was literally created in a lab.
The irony of all this of course is that virtually nobody trusts the mainstream media, so when they attack conspiracy theories it just makes more people believe them.
Read the entire article HERE.
Woman who organized anti-lockdown rally in New Jersey is arrested for violating stay-at-home orders https://t.co/KfB92lryJq
— Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) April 18, 2020
Woman who organized anti-lockdown rally in New Jersey is arrested for violating stay-at-home orders
Via The Daily Mail
A woman who helped organize a COVID-19 anti-lockdown protest in New Jersey was charged for defying stay-at-home orders on Friday, authorities said.
The New Jersey Attorney General’s office said Kim Pagan, of Toms River, was charged with violating emergency orders after she organized a protest against the state’s lockdown in Trenton.
Gov. Phil Murphy first implemented the coronavirus emergency orders last month. New Jersey as at least 78,467 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 3,840 deaths.
Video shared to Facebook by Central Jersey Libertarians showed a police officer writing summonses as protestors shout and honk their cars’ horns near the statehouse.
‘We have a right to peacefully protest,’ one woman shouted, as the officer walked by a car window that reads ‘playdemic.’
State stay-at-home protests also popped up in a Walmart parking lot in Hamilton. Protesters arrived with signs, American flags and wrote anti-lockdown messages on car windows, NBC New York reports.
One window read: ‘MURPHY’S LAW WORSE THAN COVID-19.’
Gov. Murphy said New Jersey has not yet plateaued during the COVID-19 pandemic.
He said: ‘Even if the rate of our increase is lessening, which it’s hard to argue it hasn’t over the past week, we have two realities that we cannot escape. One is it is still increasing.
‘So with all due respect to this notion that we’ve found some plateau, we’re not at any plateau.
Read the entire article HERE.
Landlords Are Reportedly Asking Broke Tenants To 'Pay' Rent With Sex https://t.co/8iIwK6EPzu #zerohedge
— zerohedge (@zerohedgeupdate) April 17, 2020
Landlords Are Reportedly Asking Broke Tenants To ‘Pay’ Rent With Sex
Via Zero Hedge
Desperate times call for desperate measures. And with the Fed in the process of destroying the monetary system as we know, we can’t say we were surprised to hear that some landlords were attempting to use the age-old system of barter to accept payments.
The problem? They’re reportedly asking their broke tenants for sex, according to BuzzFeed.
Citing the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, the report details several complaints of sexual harassment since the coronavirus outbreak began.
One woman says when she texted her landlord about a more affordable property after being unable to pay her April rent, “he responded with a dick pic.” A different woman claimed that her landlord told her she could come over and “spoon him” instead of paying her April rent.
Khara Jabola-Carolus, the executive director of the commission said: “We’ve received more cases at our office in the last two days than we have in the last two years.”
She thinks the cases are becoming more egregious as tenants become unemployed, broke and more vulnerable. “Of course that’s not the root cause of why it’s happening, but it makes it easier because now [landlords] have access to people at their fingertips,” she said.
Sheryl Ring, the legal director at Open Communities, a legal aid and fair housing agency just north of Chicago said: “We have seen an uptick in sexual harassment. Since this started, they [landlords] have been taking advantage of the financial hardships many of their tenants have in order to coerce their tenants into a sex-for-rent agreement — which is absolutely illegal.”
She says sexual harassment complaints related to housing are up threefold in the last month. Ring was already working on six cases before the epidemic began and says that women of color and trans women are the most likely to be targeted. Ring advises women not to give in to trying to negotiate with landlords at all if the topic comes up.
“You can’t really negotiate how much illegality the landlord is willing to do,” she said. “We’ve heard some landlords are attempting to use the situation where a tenant falls behind to pressure a tenant into exchanging sex for rent,” she continued.
“It’s important to know what your rights are as quickly as possible. Even now, just because courts are closed to most things, it doesn’t mean you do not have recourse right now and can’t be protected,” Ring concluded.
Read the entire article HERE.
So city workers filled a skateboard park w 37 TONS of sand to stop people from skating OUTSIDE in the open?
Nice to have ESSENTIAL JOBS working for the city, right?
Those dumping the sand don't have to be under #housearrest?#ConstitutionDistancing https://t.co/YQfjvHQ3Dv— David Knight (@libertytarian) April 17, 2020
Skaters Wouldn’t Stay Away From Skate Court So The City Dumped 37 Tons Of Sand On It
Via CBS Los Angeles
A popular skatepark in San Clemente was filled with sand to discourage skaters from using it during the coronavirus pandemic and to promote social distancing.
San Clemente had shut down all its parks and facilities on April 1 under the state’s stay-at-home orders, but skaters ignored signs warning against trespassing at the Ralphs Skate Court, 241 Avenida La Pata.
Since park facilities have been closed city officials say they routinely saw people visit the skatepark, even by some children accompanied with their parents, according to the San Clemente Times. City officials told the newspaper they followed in the footsteps of other cities, and filled the skatepark with 37 tons of sand.
The nonprofit group that has raised money to support the skatepark, however, says the city made the decision to fill the skatepark with sand without notifying them first.
Read the entire article HERE.
Be sure to subscribe to Def-Con News to get Breakfast For The Brain in your morning mailbox.