Liberals have long tried to tie gun ownership rights to hunting despite the complete lack of a hunting clause in the 2nd Amendment. “Shotgun” Joe Biden took this a step further by claiming the only reason people are allowed to own a gun is to hunt migratory game birds. That’s a pretty whacky interpretation of the Constitution, but then again Crazy Joe is a pretty whacky guy.
Biden unveiled his gun control plan on his website and it’s about what you’d expect from a democrat: gun bans, gun confiscations, destroy the NRA and the gun manufacturers, disarming law-abiding people while ignoring criminals, etc…
There were how ever a few Bidian twists including this from his semi-automatic weapon ban which he calls: “Get weapons of war off our streets.”
Ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more than three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children. It’s wrong.
In a weird kind of way, Biden is right about one thing: this is wrong. Federal law allows for people to hunt ducks, but there is no such license one can acquire to hunt children. The number of shotgun shells a hunter can have when hunting children is zero because it’s not allowed. Also, the number of children hunters are allowed to kill in a given season is zero. Clearly Joe Biden thinks that hunting children is legal, which is the most bonkers thing this insane mofo believes.
He’s additionally wrong that gun ownership has anything to do with hunting and more specifically hunting migratory game birds. I don’t think Joe is a regular Def-Con News reader, but since he’s locked in his basement during the coronavirus he’s probably come across our site a time or 2 doing a Google search of his name. For his benefit, this is the full text of the 2nd Amendment, which guarantees our gun ownership rights:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Of the 27 words making up the 2nd Amendment, not one of them is “ducks” or “hunting.” There is also no provision for the government to restrict the people’s right to keep and bear arms and, in fact, it’s stated very clearly that this right “shall not be infringed.”
Again, for Joe’s benefit, “infringe” means to actively break the terms of a law or agreement. Banning entire classes of weapons breaks the terms of the 2nd Amendment, which is part of the highest law of the land, and is therefore an infringement of the people’s right to keep and bear arms.
I don’t expect Joe to understand all of this stuff by himself, his brain is melted pudding with raisins, but maybe one of his handlers can give him the gist of all this.
The good news for Joe is that there is no specific Constitutional Amendment forbidding him from sniffing women’s hair or letting little kids rub his hairy legs in the pool. The good news for us is that Joe Biden is so far gone that there’s no chance in hell that he will ever be president to have the chance to test the constitutionality of his ridiculous “duck hunting” gun control plan.
