For 8 years the liberal media ran fluff piece after fluff piece about how glamorous and beautiful Michelle Obama is, like we don’t have eyes. Now that there is a genuinely beautiful First Lady, who happens to be a supermodel, the liberal media can’t bring itself to do similar fluff pieces because it’s part of the way they are resisting the will of the American people. While playing up middle linebacker Michelle Obama as a stunning beauty was pathetic, things have devolved to the point where the Washington Post is claiming that Stacy Abrams is a supermodel.
Last week the WaPo did a profile on the world’s sorest loser, Stacy Abrams. Because the WaPo has a shitty business model, this profile is behind a paywall, but luckily there’s this thing called the Internet in which all information is free.
The thing about this profile is, if I didn’t know better, I’d say Abrams wrote it herself. She has a rather high opinion of herself. Check this crap out:
Pandemonium ensues as she walks to the far left of the stage, like a runway supermodel, stops on a dime, poses, tilts her head slightly and smiles. Camera flashes explode. She next pivots and walks slowly to the center of the stage, freezes there and repeats the pose. Again, the flashes explode. Abrams is summoning her inner actress, and she is both enjoying the moment and getting through it to get to the conversation.
And here’s a photo that accompanied that crap:
Okay, Abrams makes a great solar eclipse with her mass being sufficient to block out the sun, but a supermodel? She’s not even a “butterface” because everything on her is wrong and aesthetically offensive.
This is taking fake news to Orwellian heights: Fat is slim, ugly is beautiful, teeth gaps are sexy, grotesque is not grotesque, etc…
It’s one thing to push a false narrative that President Trump colluded with the Russians for three and half years, but the WaPo’s journalistic intercity just died when they tried to convince people that Stacy Abrams is a sex symbol.
On top of which, she’s a nothing loser. Why in the hell does the liberal media insist upon promoting Abrams as an important political force? The only thing she ever did was lose the Georgia governor’s race and then refuse to concede, insisting she really won.
If a Republican did the same thing Abrams did, the media would mock this nonexistent sore loser mercilessly. I guess being black and and liberal means she gets treated like a winner when she’s a complete failure.
The liberal media is like: We hate being called fake news. We are the only thing holding our democracy together. We demand respect.
But then the liberal media is also like: Here’s a piece about what a stunningly beautiful supermodel election-loser Stacy Abrams is.
I did a search of WaPo articles about First Lady Melania Trump to see if there were any in which they even hinted or alluded to her beauty. There were none, but plenty attacking her:
Is Melania Trump sending coded messages
Melania Trump is no Jackie O
Melania Trump ignores coronavirus from inside her Be Best bubble
Melania Trump’s indefensible defense of her bully husband
Don’t bother trying to click on that stuff, WaPo’s fake news is behind a real paywall and I’m unwilling to give them a link.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is so bad at the WaPo that they can’t admit that Melania Trump is easy on the eyes but they think Stacy Abrams is a hot piece of ass. Fake news used to rely on people not having brains but now it counts on them not having eyes.
