Thank God It’s FRIDAY!
About That Photograph – NASCAR Panics After Someone Caught Intentionally Promoting “Fake Noose” Story – Provide Photo of “Noose”, But Picture Makes Their Story Worse…
By Sundance/The Conservative Treehouse
Today, NASCAR released a picture of the garage pull-down rope and knot that both they and Bubba Wallace described as a “noose hanging over the car“.
Except it clearly was not hanging over the car, and it clearly wasn’t a “noose” or it wouldn’t function to help pull the door down. Driver Bubba Wallace now calls it “a non-functioning noose.” Or, in simple terms, a garage pull-down rope with a loop-knot tied in the end.
However, what NASCAR does not yet realize is the picture they have provided actually makes the situation worse; because the picture shows something else, something worse.
The picture was taken Sunday, in Bubba Wallace’s garage stall #4, when the race was cancelled due to inclement weather (rain and lightning). However, pay close attention to the partially visible uniform on the man standing at the left of the picture.
That person is a member of the Wood Brothers Race Team and this is a VERY important facet. The picture was taken Sunday, prior to the “noose” (hereafter called a knot) being cut down. According to a statement by the Wood Brothers team, they informed NASCAR officials the garage-pull in question was in place in 2019:
“One of our employees notified us yesterday … he recalled seeing a tied handle in the garage, from last fall. We immediately notified NASCAR and have assisted the investigation”. (link)
So that would explain why one of the Wood Brothers team was present on Sunday June 21st when the photograph was taken.
But here’s the problem…. If that picture was taken by NASCAR that means NASCAR was aware the knot in question was in place in 2019; and therefore knew Bubba Wallace was not the target…. and they would know this on Sunday; before they went out and made a big racial publicity stunt over it.
If it wasn’t NASCAR that took the picture, and the picture was taken by a member of Bubba Wallace’s #43 crew, that means the Richard Petty Motorsports team was aware their driver Bubba Wallace was not a target, and it was the team who made a big racial publicity stunt over it. This scenario seems most likely.
The visibility of a Wood Brothers crew member in the picture taken Sunday means either NASCAR knew the provenance, and/or Richard Petty Motorsports knew the provenance, before they made a big, fake, racially explosive media narrative about it. Either way is very bad news for the sport of NASCAR because that truth highlights a very damaging intent.
Read the entire article HERE.
Big Tech’s War On Speech Is A War On You… And You’re Losing.
Via The National Pulse
Rather, the revelations are an utterly unsurprising glimpse into the reality of online censorship and the bureaucratic machinery of the massive “content moderation” empire that Silicon Valley has assembled to appease liberal journalists and their own far-left employees who have never stopped being upset over losing the 2016 election.
Of course, instead of recognizing that the American people voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton as a rebuke to a corrupt political establishment that left them behind for decades, the liberal media and their leftwing friends in Big Tech decided to “blame” President Trump’s victory on something different: free speech on the internet.
In Project Veritas’s most recent expose, you can very clearly see the results of Big Tech’s new war on internet free speech.
It’s all there, the smug Accenture management consultants, the drone-like contractors at censorship firm Cognizant, and the supposedly impartial algorithms that have — in the space of just a few years — transformed the web into the lop-sided mess of biased content restrictions we know today.
As it turns out, the reality of Big Tech censorship looks exactly like we all imagined.
There are actually rooms full of predominantly leftist employees reading conservative posts and deleting them for no other reason than their conservative content. There are, in fact, official memos coming down from Big Tech executives that employ convoluted reasoning to excuse the left’s use of violent imagery and naked racial hatred from the draconian censorship that is routinely applied to far less provocative posts from the other side of the spectrum.
Read the entire article HERE.
NYT Staff Writer and Pulitzer Prize Winner Calls White Race ‘Barbaric Devils’ and ‘Bloodsuckers’
Via The National File
The founder of the New York Times’ 1619 Project and Pulitzer Prize winner wrote a letter as a sophomore, colorfully condemning all white people in a barnstorming screed to the editor in Notre Dame’s The Observer.
A common theme in recent weeks has been anti-white racism, following the Black Lives Matter-led backlash that ensued after the in-custody killing of George Floyd. Several opinion pieces promoted fallacious notions of so-called “white privilege” – which is now widely accepted as gospel to many.
Nicole Hannah-Jones wrote a piece titled “Modern Savagery” in 1995 where she accused the “savage” white race of being “the biggest murderer, rapist, pillager, and thief of the modern world,” in a letter exercising questionable historical understanding.
She claims that white people have “committed genocide against cultures that have never offended them in their greed and insatiable desire to control and dominate every non-white culture,” bolstering the claims within her letter.
“Christopher Columbus and those like him were no different then [sic] Hitler,” she goes onto add, before suggesting that Native American and Africans traded technological and harbored a mutual respect. Aztec pyramids and Olmec heads were allegedly a testament to their long-standing friendship.
Whereas the white race’s “lasting monument was the destruction and enslavement of the two people,” she writes, in stark contrast to Native Americans.
Hannah-Jones later goes onto accuse “savage” white people of causing the ailments within the black community. She claims: “the descendants of these savage people pump drugs and guns into the Black community, pack Black people into the squalor of segregated urban ghettos and continue to be bloodsuckers in our community.”
The recent Black Lives Matter protests and riots have made race relations appear fragile a few months out from the 2020 U.S. Presidential elections.
Read the entire article HERE.
POLL: 58% of “Very Liberal” Americans Support Destroying Mount Rushmore
Via Big League Politics
A majority of self-identifying “very liberal” Americans would support destroying Mount Rushmore in an act of retribution for the alleged “racism” and cultural ideals the iconic monument represents.
Eric Kaufman, a Canadian academic and author, decided to poll liberal Americans on their support of the widespread cultural destruction occurring throughout the United States at the behest of the state. He asked a polling sample sixteen different questions on the cultural vandalism, among them asking their support for a motion to “respectfully remove the monument to four white male presidents at Mount Rushmore, as they presided over the conquest of Native people and repression of women and minorities.”
An easy majority of 58% of “very liberal” Americans support the notion of destroying Mount Rushmore. 44% of “liberal” Americans agree.
The pollster states that he queried 870 Americans, asking them 16 questions on the topic of cultural destruction and leftist antipathy towards American images and statues.
7 in 10 liberals also vocalize their support for a motion to “Move, after public consultation, to a new American constitution that better reflects our diversity as a people.”
40% of “very liberal” Americans(a term frankly questionable to describe them with) even support the very premise of “renaming the United States” and replacing the American flag.
Mount Rushmore, a massive bas-relief in the Black Hills of South Dakota, depicts the faces of Presidents Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson. It’s sometimes described as a modern wonder of the world; and remains one of the most widely known artifacts of American civilization across the world.
Should it be destroyed in accordance with the wishes of a majority of “very liberal” Americans, there’s reason to believe that the civilization affiliated with the iconic American men would be destined for a similar destruction; replaced with a new “progressive” society organized around racial heritage.
Read the entire article HERE.
Man Horrified As Kids Give Him Noose For Father’s Day
Via The Babylon Bee
CHARLESTOWN, RI—Local father of two Bradley Carson was horrified, shocked, offended, and aggrieved Sunday as his family gave him several racist symbols for Father’s Day, the kids and his wife each having given him a noose.
“I was literally shaking,” Carson, a white progressive, said. “It was a clear message, plain and simple: we hate you because of your skin color. Well, I mean, not my skin color. But I’m offended on behalf of some people somewhere who might have been offended by this.”
Carson called the FBI to investigate. After a thorough search of his house, they determined the nooses were actually neckties and that he had several dozen of them in his closet. Carson is standing by his story, though, saying, “I know a noose when I see one. This was a loop that goes around a human’s neck for no other purpose than to send a racist dog whistle to my oppressors.”
“It is literally violence.”
The man later fainted from shock while tying his shoes.
Check out all of the Bee’s takes on politics and society HERE.
Be sure to subscribe to Def-Con News to get Breakfast For The Brain in your morning mailbox.
