Monday Morning Breakfast For The Brain

Served up piping hot just for you.

Regime vs. Regime

Via American Greatness

We who swear to uphold the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic owe no allegiance whatever to the oligarchy that now runs this country.

The attempt of America’s ruling class to convict 455 persons of “armed insurrection”—i.e. of waging war against the United States, a species of treason—for protesting insufficient scrutiny of the 2020 election on January 6 in the Capitol, while at the same time it excuses and even cheers the burning and looting of courthouses, police stations, and downtowns all over America, is not the exercise of a “double standard.”

The people in and out of government who do this are not corrupt. Instead, acting as part of the regime—the oligarchy—they are replacing the American republic and waging war to crush its remains.

The sooner Americans realize that we are being governed by people at war with our Constitution and contemptuous of ourselves, the sooner those people may be treated as the enemies they are.

In the Washington Post, the Justice Department explained why the words of its indictments of those it claims trespassed on the Capitol will not result in the severe prison sentences they imply. Those words try to fit acts prima facie of mostly peaceful protest into the Democratic Party’s and associated oligarchy’s narrative of “armed insurrection against our democracy.” But in the Post story these “legal experts” mention regretfully that, their best efforts notwithstanding, what remains of the U.S. legal system cannot wholly erase the fact that “trespassing is still only trespassing, even in the U.S. Capitol,” and that “a misdemeanor is still only a misdemeanor.” Drat, still!

Nevertheless, these prosecutors and friendly experts fill most of the article with how they combine unlimited pretrial detention under harsh circumstances and limitation of legal assistance to press the accused to accept maximum penalties and to forgo bringing cases to juries.

The Narrative vs. Reality

Keeping evaluation of cases within the administrative-judicial system—out of the hands of the accused’s peers—is an essential part of suppressing the reality of what happened and did not happen on January 6. Forcing the accused to plead guilty to charges formulated according to the narrative that white supremacist Americans unlawfully obstructed the 2020 election is essential to establishing the validity of that fraudulent political claim.

That, in turn, is an essential weapon in the oligarchy’s attack on the American republic and its supporters. Reality is the opposite: the oligarchy itself committed the only unlawful acts of interference during the 2020 election. Anyone looking for evidence of oligarchic interference may begin with Time magazine’s February 4 story, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election” and continue to the ongoing campaigns to thwart audits of vote counts.

Today’s Justice Department, acting as part and parcel of the oligarchy that calls itself “our democracy” has pushed partisanship to the point of war by one regime in favor of another. Inevitably, this has created the horrid reality of political prisoners among us—people who are being punished for supporting the republic against the oligarchy. When regimes war on each other, whose side you are on becomes the practical definition of justice. MORE.

FBI raid on wrong house raises fears over politicized policing in wake of Capitol riot

Via The Washington Examiner

In the early hours of one April morning, about a dozen armed federal agents burst through the door of the Homer Inn & Spa and surged the halls of the picturesque lodge.

The owners and guests startled awake to guns drawn on them as surly agents barked commands, handcuffing them before tearing the place apart.

“We’re looking for Nancy Pelosi’s laptop,” the agents told Marilyn Hueper after placing her in cuffs.

Marilyn owns the inn with her husband, Paul Hueper.

“That still doesn’t explain why you’re in my home. Or in Homer, Alaska,” she replied.

The scene played out in a little coastal town known as “the cosmic hamlet by the sea” at the southern end of the Kenai Peninsula on April 28. But the story begins thousands of miles away in Washington, D.C., nearly four months earlier, when Trump supporters entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 in a protest gone awry.

The FBI identified Marilyn Hueper as the woman seen interacting with a laptop taken from Pelosi’s desk that day. The FBI said in its application for a warrant it “confirmed the woman in photograph’s [sic] 225 A and B was MARILYN HUEPER by comparing MARILYN HUEPER’s Driver License photograph.”

But it looks as if the agency made a mistake.

The Huepers did visit Washington on Jan. 6. They listened to then-President Donald Trump’s speech on the Washington Mall along with thousands of others. They then found themselves at the back of a long and peaceful procession, got lost, bought a hot dog, and ultimately did not come within a hundred yards of the Capitol’s entrance.

The FBI thought it had positively identified Marilyn Hueper when it compared surveillance footage in the Capitol to the couple’s social media posts. Investigators noted a resemblance between a yet-to-be-identified woman and Marilyn Hueper. The two both wore black coats but different layers, accessories, and jewelry.

During the raid, the agents claimed they had identified Marilyn as the woman in question and demanded information about her accomplices. When she pointed out the obvious differences between the suspect and herself and demanded to see a warrant, they grew angry.

“What we’re hearing is that you don’t want to cooperate, that you want us to report back that you’re lying to federal agents, and that you are obstructing justice,” Marilyn Hueper recalls them saying.

At one point, she grabbed a photo the agents brought with them and held it up to her face.

“Me. Her. Me. Her,” she said.

Apart from the differences in dress, Marilyn Hueper noted, the other woman has detached earlobes, while she does not. The agent took back the picture and walked away.

The FBI is calling the incident “a court-authorized law-enforcement activity,” rather than a raid. But that “activity” certainly seemed a lot like a raid to the Huepers and their guests. MORE.

Government Scientific Advisors Admit Using “Totalitarian” Fear Tactics To Control People During Pandemic, Report

Via True Pundit

Scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government have expressed regret for using what they now admit to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behaviour during the pandemic, according to a report.

The London Telegraph reports the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

The unnamed scientist adds that “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another separate scientist on the subcommittee professed “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”

Another scientist warned that “We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in,” adding “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise.”

According to the report, another researcher with the group acknowledged that “Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon,” adding that “Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.” MORE.

Anthony Fauci Reverses Course: ‘Not Convinced’ Chinese Coronavirus Developed Naturally

Via Breitbart News

Dr. Anthony Fauci reversed course May 11, claiming he is “not convinced” the Chinese coronavirus developed naturally and that its origins merit investigation.

“No, actually. … No, I’m not convinced about that. I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of our ability exactly what happened,” Fauci said during an interview when a PolitiFact reporter asked, “There’s a lot of cloudiness around the origins of COVID-19 [Chinese coronavirus] still, so I wanted to ask, are you still confident that it developed naturally?”

“Certainly, the people who’ve investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals,” Fauci continued to backtrack, “but it could’ve been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favor of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus.”

The Pentagon Is Behind the Fake Alien Agenda

Via The Unz Review

On Sunday, 60 Minutes aired a report about UFOs. Journalist Bill Whitaker interviewed several people from the military to discuss the allegation put forward by the Pentagon that there are ultra-advanced aircraft flying around the earth for unknown reasons.

You should of course watch it and draw your own conclusions about what is going on there, but there’s something about this that immediately pops out at me: all the footage is from the government and all of the people claiming to have seen the crafts are from the government.

I think it is now beyond any doubt that the government is pushing a fake alien agenda which is likely to start heating up quickly.

Fake Aliens are Not a New Idea

After 60 Minutes aired this program, the entire media began talking about the topic of UFOs. Someone yesterday told me: “Project Blue Beam is real.” I don’t think it is real, but it is certainly relevant to this discussion.

Project Blue Beam is a conspiracy theory from the 1990s that the US government would use holograms to project flying saucers into the air and then fake an alien contact event and the return of Jesus Christ.

—

The Military is the One Releasing the Footage, The “Whistleblowers” are All from the Military

I’m not really willing to entertain the idea of actual aliens, on principle. It’s not a religious principle, but just science. There is no way to travel faster than the speed of light. I know we’ve spent our lives seeing “warp drive” in science fiction, but that is not real. Wormholes and so on are just abject nonsense. This means that it would take a ridiculously long time for aliens to reach earth. They would have to freeze themselves, or send robots, and there is just no coherent explanation as to why they would come here and then just fly around in ships harassing the US military.

It just doesn’t make logical sense. The logical, sensible thing is that if we are seeing UFOs here, they are from here.

However, we don’t have to go into any of that, for a very simple reason: these videos are all being released directly by the US military. As far as I’m aware, every single one of these videos that has popped up in the last few years – including every video featured on the latest 60 Minutes episode – is from the military.

Furthermore, everyone interviewed by the show, save Marco Rubio, is from the military. (And Rubio was the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.) MORE.

Be sure to stop by at Def-Con News to get our morning started off right.