Elon Musk Challenged Adam Schiff: ‘Did you approve hidden state censorship in direct violation of the Constitution’?

Elon Musk recently responded in a tweet to chronic liar U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff.

This from survivethenews.com.

Did you approve Hidden State Censorship in direct violation of the Constitution?

Below from thegatewaypundit.com.

 

Here is the retweet.

Do not think that the children of darkness act with honesty, and do not be scandalized if they operate with deception. Do you perhaps believe that Satan’s followers are honest, sincere, and loyal?

This is so true. Liars lie. That’s what they do. Don’t trust liars.

The following from thepostmillennial.com.

Those Twitter Files were released on December 19 in a lengthy thread by author Michael Shellenberger.

Part 6 of the files, which were broken down by journalist Matt Taibbi, revealed that:

Twitter’s contact with the FBI was constant and pervasive as if it were a subsidiary.

Taibbi continued:

Between January 2020 and November 2022, there were over 150 emails between the FBI and former Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth.

[A] surprisingly high number are requested by the FBI for Twitter to take action on election misinformation, even involving joke tweets from low-follower accounts.

Musk also said on Tuesday that he was in favor of seeing a new Church Commission, an idea put forward by investor David Sacks.

The Church Committee of 1975 was a US Senate select committee that investigated abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Internal Revenue Service.

Sacks said:

We need a new Church Commission to investigate why the FBI and Intelligence Community are engaged in social media censorship, including the suppression of the Hunter Biden story.

Musk replied:

Hear, hear!!

Final thoughts: A Church Commission, indeed. I’m thinking it should be conducted in an old Catholic Church dungeon with shackles, chains, and whips. But this should be merely the start. Waterboarding will be necessary, of course.