SMOKING GUN OF FRAUD: Fauci used government grant money to buy off scientists over covid origins

Newly released emails show that disgraced government career criminal Tony Fauci knew from the very beginning that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) did not come from bat soup in communist China as was widely claimed by the government and the media.

This from survivethenews.com.

In January 2020 (and likely much earlier than that), Fauci was aware, according to email correspondences, that covid is a man-made invention, not a random act of nature.

According to an email sent to Fauci by British researcher Dr. Kristian Andersen on Jan. 31, 2020, at 10:32pm:

[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.

The email continued:

Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.

Two hours later at 12:29am on Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci emailed his long-time deputy, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, that included a paper written by Ralph Baric and Zhengli-Li Shi, the so-called “bat woman” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

 

“That paper highlighted the taxpayer-funded

gain of function (GoF) research that was taking place

on coronaviruses prior to the launch of the scamdemic.”

 

Fauci wrote with urgency:

It is essential that we speak this [morning]. Keep your cell phone on … read this paper … you will have tasks today that must be done.

 

(Remember when Fauci admitted covid “vaccines” spread disease? Click HERE.)

 

Fauci has proven to be deceptive and must be brought to justice.

 

Two hours after that correspondence—at 2:48am—why is Fauci awake in the middle of the night sending urgent emails about bat coronaviruses?

Fauci emailed Robert Kadlec, a Trump-appointed Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services.

In that email, Fauci downplayed the lab leak theory and pushed for an evolutionary origin to covid.

Fauci wrote:

Bob: This came out today. Gives a balanced view.

In this email, Fauci was calm and collected. In his previous email to Auchincloss, Fauci was urgent and frantic. Why the change in tone? And why did Fauci not send Kadlec the Baric-Shi study that he sent to Auchincloss?

The answer, as penned by The Federalist‘s Jim Jordan, is this:

The paper that supported the original message from Dr. Andersen that COVID-19 looked engineered, was inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and linked American tax dollars to gain of function research at the WIV.

Keep in mind that Andersen, who sent Fauci the initial email in this sequence, had already received millions of dollars in grant money from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is connected to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the federal agency that Fauci oversaw.

Later that morning, at 11:47am, Auchincloss responded to Fauci, confirming that American tax dollars were, in fact, used to perform GoF research at the WIVand that this research did not go through proper oversight.

Jordan explains:

Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China.

In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.

First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China …

Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process—a process known as the P3 framework …

Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus ‘looked … engineered’ and seemed to be ‘inconsistent with evolutionary theory.’

Fauci then proceeded to arrange a conference call that included 11 virologists from around the world, including Andersen.

Nearly every participant had previously been awarded American taxpayer-funded grants by Fauci—and missing was Kadlec, Fauci’s boss at the HHS.

The following from thefederalist.com.

Who was not on the call?

 – Dr. Kadlec, Dr. Fauci’s superior at HHS.

 – Dr. Robert Redfield, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 – Dr. Brett Giroir, Assistant Secretary for Health.

 – Or Dr. Birx, the soon-to-be COVID-19 Response Coordinator.

In fact, there was not a single U.S. government official on the call, except for Dr. Fauci.

What happened on the call? This is not known. All of the emails discussing the call have been redacted.

However, four days later. Dr. Andersen, the virologist who sent the original 10:32 p.m. email on January 31, went public with this statement:

The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered . . . and that is demonstrably false.

In four days, Dr. Andersen flipped 180 degrees! The only intervening event appears to be the conference call with Dr. Fauci.

In addition, over the next few weeks, Dr. Andersen and three others on the conference call penned an article in Nature Medicine. The article included the definitive statement, that:

 

“Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct . . . “

 

In a White House press briefing as an authoritative source when asked about the virus’ origins, Dr. Fauci cited the very article he put in motion on the conference call, and he was allowed to edit.

Dr. Fauci knew COVID-19 likely came from the WIV.

He knew American taxpayers funded gain of function research on coronaviruses at the WIV.

He knew this funding bypassed required oversight.

[H]e knew the virus ‘looked…engineered’ and was ‘inconsistent with evolutionary theory.’

And he knew all this on February 1, 2020.

Information of this magnitude should have been taken directly to the President of the United States.

Instead, Dr. Fauci organized a conference call with 11 non-governmental virologists to cover his tracks.

Final thoughts: There may possibly be a more accurate explanation why Dr. Fauci performed as he did, and once Conservatism returns to leadership of the United States of America, he will meet a Military Tribunal. He will likely not testify, however, the evidence is already available.