During Kamala Harris’s lackluster stint as the “border czar,” she ignominiously claimed that while we have a “broken immigration system,” the border was still “secure.”
Many Texans have seen first hand—and now Americans throughout our beloved country see—the results of the waves of illegal immigrants walking, traveling by buses, receiving a host of free government benefits, so we know the “border czar’ was lying—or more likely, was sadly confused.
This from thepatriotjournal.com.
We the People believed that with the lowest approval rating of any veep, Harris would be kept out of sight, that she wouldn’t be put in charge of anything ever again. But now, the White House has other plans for her:
Once you know about it, you’ll probably wonder why she is again in charge of something that needs intelligent, careful handling.
From Breitbart:
Harris is meeting with Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to discuss how potential risks involving AI can be reduced.
The Obiden Regime said:
AI is one of the most powerful technologies of our time, but in order to seize the opportunities it presents, we must first mitigate its risks.
The White House intends to launch 7 new AI research institutes (bringing the overall total to 25), and that will lead to a “public evaluation of AI systems.”
But putting Harris in charge of reducing risks? …a horrible choice.
AI is a very real and serious threat, and the problem is now more than just bots, as many teachers have observed students cheating by using AI to write for them. Copyright infringement is another issue, even when digital artwork has watermarks.
Malicious people can also use AI to imposter others in pictures or videos. Apps like Neuralblender were clearly AI and previous TikTok filters were obviously fake. Now, TikTok has AI-powered filters that are extremely realistic-looking.
Kamala is going to spend a cool $140 million on mitigating AI risks?
She couldn’t secure the border, so We the People seriously doubt she can mitigate anything. For starters, the least she could do is pass the letter calling for a six-month halt on AI development that Elon Musk signed—but nothing has become of that.
Yes, even the founder of Neuralink has concerns that AI will be able to think independently, and that’s saying something—because many Americans have concerns that people will use AI for image-based sexual abuse, identity theft, harassment, and more.
Most won’t deny that AI has some good uses, but the human touch is creative and invaluable.
The “antiwork” crowd of liberals wants their work cut out for them—I just don’t think they’ll enjoy it if they get what they want and end up as totally non-productive citizens.
We cannot think of it as progression if we go from letting illegal immigrants have our jobs to letting AI have our jobs.
And putting the poor imitation of a Veep in charge of such an important issue, especially given her track record, seems like something much worse than a bad idea.
By the way, did Harris ever accomplish anything worth noting while a District Attorney or as the California Attorney General? That is, anything other than what was then written on men’s bathroom walls?
Final thoughts: What are they thinking? Giving oversight of AI development—something that may very well become capable of thinking independently to someone who many believe is incapable of thinking independently has ‘failure’ written all over it.
If it hasn’t been already, the genie will soon be let out of the bottle.
