Michigan Governor “Witch-mer” Changes Rules on Investigations of Voter Fraud

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed into law two bills this week that will significantly alter rules regarding investigations of voter fraud in elections.

Critics say they will undermine confidence in the electoral process and make investigating voter fraud significantly more difficult.

This from infowars.com.

Senate Bill 603 states that a voter recount:

[Will not be an] investigation or an audit of the conduct of an election, [nor will it be used to decide] the qualifications of electors participating in an election or the manner in which ballots are applied for or issued to electors.

What was that?

According to a news release from Governor Whitmer’s office:

[A] satisfactory explanation [for a recount and a] sworn affidavit in a form prescribed by the Secretary of State.

Well, that doesn’t make any of the above any easier to understand.

The cost of recount fees will also be increased and, crucially, a filing for a recount must be submitted within 48 hours of the certification of the vote by a board of canvassers. Boards of canvassers will not be allowed to investigate claims of voter fraud themselves, but must refer the matter to the prosecuting attorney of the county of the office of the state attorney general.

The second bill, Bill 604, alters sentencing guidelines for recount violations.

Governor Whitmer in the news release said:

These bipartisan bills address a range of issues that will build a stronger future for our communities.

How so?

Governor Whitmer added that the two laws:

[Will ensure] fair and free elections that make sure the winner can take office without unnecessary interference.

Again, how so?

The bills were opposed by Republican politicians in the state, who argued that they would diminish confidence in the fairness of elections and make it harder to investigate voter fraud.

From State Rep. Ann Bollin, last month:

I understand the importance of preventing frivolous recounts, but we must also acknowledge the rights of candidates and voters to ensure they have confidence in the results.

Further:

By making recounts too expensive, we are effectively pricing out local candidates from ensuring the accuracy of election results and diminishing the public’s confidence in the process.

Other critics suggest the measures are counterproductive and will make it harder to determine whether individuals have voted in multiple states.

Final thought: Me thinks Queen Gretchen I of the Domain of Michigan is tightening her tyrannical control over her subjects.