Dear Kamala is America’s first backroom-apparatchik presidential election-candidate appointee.
This from thepatriotjournal.com.
And many Americans are questioning the legitimacy of the process. No s**t!!
Most will be inclined to believe she was first in line to assume Biden’s role because she is his vice president—although she is just as illegitimate and incompetent as he has been.
Never mind the fact that she has done nothing as vice president—or as senator previously—that would make her qualified to lead our beloved country—our any other country.
Voters will need to take a good, hard look at this communist/globalist radical. No doubt, she does not have what it takes to be president. Remember why Dementia Joe picked her—her gender and her mixed-race status.
A poll asked voters what they thought of Kamala’s role as vice president. Some of them floated a title the Left has been trying to hide. But it seems, more than a mere few voters think this about her.
From Rasmussen Reports:
Controversy over so-called DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) policies has intruded on this year’s presidential campaign, with some critics accusing Vice President Kamala Harris of being a ‘DEI hire.’
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 41% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it’s fair to call Harris a “DEI hire,” while 45% don’t think it’s a fair accusation and 15% are not sure.
For those unfamiliar, DEI is a set of policies designed to promote, you guessed it, diversity, equity, and inclusion—it is a 2020s license to be racist. So, what does this mean for Dear Kamala, and why is it causing such a ruckus?
Critics argue that it reduces Dear Kamala’s accomplishments to her race and gender, implying that she was chosen not for her qualifications, but to check off boxes on a diversity list. Yet, the fact that 41 percent of voters agree with this characterization shows that it is an idea with some traction. The truth is a difficult thing to convincingly deny.
Now, the survey did not just stop with Dear Kamala. It also dove into the broader—and equally contentious—topic of DEI policies. Here is where things get interesting. Of voters polled, 27 percent believe that criticizing DEI policies is inherently racist. Meanwhile, almost half of the respondents—49 percent—disagree, arguing that DEI criticism is not racist at all. The remaining 24 percent are undecided, perhaps wary of stepping into this particular minefield.
Liberals cannot blame this backlash on ignorance. It turns out that familiarity with DEI policies plays a role. Among those who are “very familiar” with DEI, a solid 59 percent think it is perfectly fine to criticize without being labeled a racist. This suggests that the more you know about DEI, the less likely you are to see any criticism as inherently biased.
But let us move beyond the bulls**t. The Polls be damned.
Simply put, DEI is 2020s licensed racism.
The Left is trying to hide from this inconvenient issue. Dementia Joe picked Dear Kamala because she was a woman of color, not because she is qualified to be vice president. That is the definition of DEI policy, putting race or gender ahead of qualifications. To emphasize this, let us ask, ‘What is the media saying about Kamala?’
Answer: She will be the first woman of color president if elected. So, they do not want her elected because she will be a good president, but because of DEI.
Final thought: Again, the truth is a difficult thing to convincingly deny.
