Tuesday Morning Breakfast For The Brain

Now that Monday is in the past, are you Deplorables ready for terrible Tuesday.

You May Now Kiss The Ring Of Al Sharpton, The Country’s Biggest Race Baiter

By Ben Garrison

The 2020 Democrats are all rushing to see who can be the most “woke”. All of them publicly genuflected before Al Sharpton, his Majesty of race baiting and buffoonery.

The National Action Network convention this week was just an opportunity for the radical 2020 Democrats to show just how far left they are, all of them squealed “Yes!” when asked if they would sign a reparations bill. Hickenlooper hesitated and was scolded by the audience.

More Free Stuff! NOW!

AOC attended the event also, (she shows up every where, doesn’t she?) The Democrat Leader followed in the steps of Hillary Clinton and put on her best phony southern accent, all that was missing was the “hot Sauce” in her purse.

When called out about her pandering, AOC lied again and claimed that “I am from the Bronx, and we always talk like that” (You racist!)

She lied to get out of a lie, she is from Westchester.

Funny how Democrats have to do their best “black preacher” impersonation when they are in front of a black audience.

The best wrap-up of this embarrassing Democrat debacle is by respected civil rights leader, Michael Meyers, executive director of the New York Civil Rights Coalition. He told Laura Ingraham:

LAURA INGRAHAM: The 2020 fanatics have renewed their calls for reparations while kissing the ring of Reverend Al at the National Action Network convention this week […] Now Michael, you say this is all a scam. Explain.

MICHAEL MEYERS: Of course it is. It’s more of that blame whitey movement, mania, madness. And it’s sheer racial rhetoric, and that’s what you get at the Al Sharpton so-called “house of justice.” You have buffoonery, and you have diversion, you have distraction. You have this notion of farce. So, at that house of so-called justice, you have either a horror picture show showing, or you have a farce. Either way, it is not to be taken seriously. I can’t understand how serious presidential contenders can give legitimacy to a racial blowhard. And I think it is outrageous and silly and idiocy on the part of the presidential candidates. And anybody who thinks that white Americans are going to take the blame or going to feel guilty or give their land and their property away in some sort of reparations plot, because they feel responsibility for the sins of their forebears. They’re not.

It’s time to tell these race pandering hustlers that patriots have no skin color.

Wouldn’t that put them out of business?

Yes, yes it would.

Check out all of Ben’s great cartoons and commentary HERE.

Same People Behind Iraq War Lies Pushed Russian Collusion

Via American Greatness

For more than two years they misled us.

Exploiting fear and confusion after a shocking event, they warned that our country was in imminent danger at the hands of a mad man. They insisted that legitimate intelligence, including a CIA report issued a month before a national election and a dossier produced by reliable sources in the United Kingdom, proved the threat was real. The subject monopolized discussions on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and in the press.

They argued that the situation was so dire that it was straining our relationship with strategic allies. Any evidence to the contrary was readily dismissed. And anyone who questioned their agenda was ridiculed as a coward, a dupe, or a conspiracy theorist. The news media dedicated endless air time and column inches to anyone who wanted to repeat the falsehood.

But an investigative report released two years after the propaganda campaign began found no evidence to support their central claim. The CIA report was highly flawed. The official dossier, some concluded, was deceptive and “sexed-up.”

No, I’m not referring here to the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, although the similarities are nearly identical. I’m talking about the period between 2002 and 2004 when many of the very same people who recently peddled collusion fiction also insisted that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction—including material to produce nuclear bombs. On the heels of the horrors of 9/11, the United States and our allies waged war against Iraq in 2003 based primarily on that assurance.

Read the entire article HERE.

Ukrainian Officials Claim to Have Evidence of Democrats Colluding with Ukraine in 2016 Election

Via PJ Media

Ukrainian prosecutors say they have uncovered evidence of corruption and wrongdoing by American Democrats, including their involvement with Ukraine’s efforts to meddle in the 2016 election in favor of Hillary Clinton, John Solomon reported at the Hill.

The officials claim they have evidence of “contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump,” according to Solomon.

Additional evidence includes a Ukrainian natural gas company’s suspicious $3 million payments to American accounts tied to Joe Biden’s youngest son, and the then-Vice President’s efforts to quash the investigation.

Unfortunately, the Trump Justice Department appears to be disinterested in the evidence being offered by the Ukrainians, and it’s not clear why. Part of the problem, according to a top Ukrainian official, could be that the U.S. Embassy in Kiev has been refusing to provide Ukrainian law enforcement officials with visas so they can deliver their evidence to Washington.

“We were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the United States,” Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Department, told Solomon.  “However, the [U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn’t explicitly deny our visa, but also didn’t give it to us.”

The U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine is Marie Louise Yovanovitch, who was appointed to the post by former president Barack Obama in August of 2016. State Department officials declined to comment on the question of whether they denied or slow-walked visas for Ukrainian officials. “Visa records are confidential under U.S. law; therefore, we cannot discuss the details of individual visa cases,” a department spokesperson told Solomon.

According to Kulyk, a company with ties to prominent Democrats was allegedly involved with a Ukrainian money-laundering operation.

Read the entire article HERE.

Social Justice Prosecutors

Via The American Thinker

For years, many have bemoaned the slide of America’s higher education system down the slippery slope of moral relativism and the embracing of virtually all facets of progressive dogma while rejecting most elements of conservatism. The mere invitation of a conservative commentator to speak on college campuses is now reason enough for rioting and mass student protests. Bozo the Clown has a better chance of giving a commencement address at an Ivy League school than does Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, or their conservative contemporaries. Nowhere is this truth more prevalent than at our most prestigious law schools, and the products of those schools are now reflecting that decades-long liberal drift.

Individuals from this new class of legal eagles have advanced in all branches of government and at all levels — local, state, and federal. They have attended notable law schools, they are African-American, and they are hellbent on ushering in an era of seeking what today’s liberal law schools are pouring into their students by the bucket full — not “justice” but “social justice.”

Now finding themselves in positions of power, these social justice warriors have a deep-rooted belief in the fundamental unfairness of America in general, and our judicial system in particular. They believe that crimes for which underprivileged groups, namely blacks and Latinos, have higher rates of sentencing and incarceration, are the product of an at best a biased, and at worst a racist system; a system which they are a part of and can find ways to affect.

Read the entire article HERE.

Diana West Discusses The Red Thread – Why Did The Administrative State Target Donald Trump?…

This one’s a bit long but it’s a fascinating watch – courtesy of the awesome folks at the Conservative Treehouse; I can’t say that I’ve heard of the author but it’s food for thought.

Diana West discusses her new book “The Red Thread” with Stefan Molyneux in a recent interview. Mrs. West asks why the conspiracy against President Trump took place; and she is one of the few people openly challenging the false narrative about Russia interfering in the 2016 election.

“There was nothing normal about the 2016 presidential election, not when senior U.S. officials were turning the surveillance powers of the federal government — designed to stop terrorist attacks — against the Republican presidential team. These were the ruthless tactics of a Soviet-style police state, not a democratic republic.”

“The Red Thread asks the simple question: Why? What is it that motivated these anti-Trump conspirators from inside and around the Obama administration and Clinton networks to depart so drastically from “politics as usual” to participate in a seditious effort to overturn an election?”

FYI: I personally found this particular replay in the comments to be very interesting:

Read it HERE.

If anyone has the time to watch it, I would love to hear your feedback. Is there more to Comey’s bizarre tweets than meets the eye.

Be sure to subscribe to Def-Con News to get Breakfast For The Brain in your morning mailbox.