USA Today Disqualifies Kamala Harris For Not Being Anti-Gun Enough

As Def-Con News told you a while ago, Kamala Harris’ road to the democratic party nomination is a rocky one because black people apparently don’t like the black Senator very much. Things just got worse because anti-gun nuts don’t think she’s quite anti-gun enough for their vote. The USA Today has disqualified Harris because she claims she owns a gun for self-defense. Next thing you know, pro-abortionists will turn on her because she hasn’t had enough abortions for their liking.

Not long ago, Harris let it slip that she owns a gun, but she also said if elected president, she would use executive action to ban and confiscate guns. Sure, these two things seem in direct contradiction to one another, but you’d think that fascist promise to tear up the Constitution and disarm Americans would be enough to placate the lefty anti-gun crowd. Apparently not.

Peter Funt, son of Candid Camera’s Allen Funt, wrote an opinion piece for USA Today and according to him, Kamala Harris is done:

Kamala Harris owns a handgun. That’s disqualifying for a 2020 Democrat in my book.

Harris, a former DA, apparently thinks it’s fine to own a handgun for personal safety. That’s a position held by the NRA, not progressive Democrats.

Boy, those democrats have so many rules, don’t they? At least they get to be as racist and sexist as they want to be.

When it comes to gun ownership in America, presidential aspirant Kamala Harris has shot herself in the foot.

At a time when Democrats are toughening their positions on gun control and seeking to make it a core issue in the 2020 campaign, the California senator has conceded that her personal relationship with guns is unique among the major Democratic presidential contenders. She owns a handgun…

*Gasp!*

Her words are fine, but for a progressive like me, they are undermined by that handgun. And I can’t be the only one who is disturbed. Keeping a handgun for personal safety is a bedrock conservative view.

Conservatives also believe in fiscal responsibility. Under this reasoning, if Harris has a savings account she should be disqualified. Don’t get me wrong, Cameltoe should never be president, but it’s not because she takes a basic step to ensure her own personal safety.

The insane author of this piece then says that Harris should have disposed of her firearm and complained the she misunderstands the “nuances of the gun control argument.” Now get ready for the nuances of gun control”

Owning a handgun is a bad idea.

Not only doesn’t this guy understand the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, he has no idea what nuance is.

Kamala Harris doesn’t seem to have the courage to concede that owning a handgun for protection is a bad idea. Instead, she has given voters a real choice: Back candidates who care enough about gun control to not own handguns, or support the only major Democratic contender who has one and won’t throw it away.

I’m not defending her, but out of the 20 democrats running in 2020, she has the second most radical gun control position. Only California Rep. Eric Swalwell’s plan to nuke gun owners who won’t disarm is worse. If the anti-gun crowd is turning on her for owning a gun she’s in deeper shit than she knows.

Poor Kamala Harris. Black people don’t think she’s black enough to be black. Anti-gunners don’t think she’s anti-gun enough to be anti-gun. It’ll truly be over when feminists don’t think her cameltoe is prominent enough to qualify her as a woman.