Saying, “protecting the lives of the unborn is as despicable as hating someone for the color of his or her skin” sounds stupid, right? Well, that’s exactly what dumb blonde Kirsten Gillibrand spewed recently. The NY Senator and presidential hopeful said that being pro-life is as unacceptable as racism. Imagine that. Being in favor of life is now a hate crime in the democratic party.
Check out this horrible answer Gillibrand gave the Des Moines Register when asked about the type of federal judges she would appoint if she were president. I think it was trick question because Gillibrand is currently polling at 0% and will never be president but she definitely fell for the trick.
“I think there’s some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it’s okay to appoint a judge who’s racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America—I don’t think that those are political issues anymore,” said Gillibrand.
Killing a baby is a basic human right? I bet the baby disagrees.
“And we believe in this country in the separation of church and state, and I respect the rights of every American to hold their religious beliefs true to themselves, but our country and our Constitution has always demanded that we have a separation of church and state,” said Gillibrand continued.
What part of the Constitution demands a separation of church and state? I’m not going to hold my breath for an answer because I know it’s not in there.
And finally, the worst answer to any question in the history of questions:
“And all these efforts by President Trump and other ultra-radical conservative judges and justices to impose their faith on Americans is contrary to our Constitution and that’s what this is. And so I believe that for all of these issues, they are not issues that there is a fair other side. There is no moral equivalency when you come to racism, and I do not believe there is a moral equivalency when it comes to changing laws that deny women reproductive freedom,” Gillibrand said.
I wasn’t exaggerating. She is actually equating racism with saving unborn babies from being murdered as a matter of convenience.
Actually, now that I think about it, the democratic party has quite a racist history including slavery, genocide, internment, and segregation so maybe Gillibrand is saying that since racism is good so is saving babies from being chopped up and vacuumed out.
No, I’m pretty sure democrats are always on the side of terribleness so this is Gillibrand pretending like she thinks racism is bad to push her equally horrible stance that not all human life is precious.
And speaking of saying shitting things, what Gillibrand is really trying to get across here is that it is unacceptable to be a Christian. Real Christianity, not the liberal bastardization of the religion, frowns upon killing babies and Gillibrand is saying that opposition to abortion is not acceptable at all. You don’t even need to draw a line because she explained it all very clearly: Christianity is a bad as racism.
Put that on a bumpersticker. I double-dog dare you.
I’m not sure what demo Gillibrand is going for with this message, but so far nobody is interested in her. I imagine she’s going to continue to escalate the whacko leftist extremism until she gets to 1% or her head explodes. Either way, she’s not getting the democratic party nomination.
