Democrats are the party of participation trophies where they think everyone’s a winner despite devastating loses. Kamala Harris took this loser philosophy to her troubled presidential campaign by touting her string of defeats. Even crazier, she claims her history a failure is the reason why she is the most qualified to defeat President Trump in 2020. She may get by on a technicality since all of the 2020 democratic party candidates are prolific losers, but that still doesn’t mean any of them can beat Trump.
Here’s what the death throes of a dying presidential campaign look like:
It’s been three years to the day since our national nightmare was elected president. Since then, I’ve taken on Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Brett Kavanaugh, and more in the Senate. And I’m ready to defeat Trump in 2020. pic.twitter.com/MAlNzBWFhB
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) November 8, 2019
So she took on Sessions, Barr, and Kavanaugh and that means she can’t win against Trump? Let’s see: Jeff Sessions was confirmed, William Barr was conformed, and Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed, all by the Senate. Harris is bragging about being 0-3 which is something only the Detroit Lions would be proud of. Hey, at least it’s not 0-16. Yet.
Speaking of which, this season the Lions have “taken on” the Chiefs, Packers, Vikings, and Raiders and lost all of those games. It doesn’t mean that the Lions are ready to win the Super Bowl. In fact it means they probably won’t even make the playoffs.
See any similarities to Kamala Harris here? She’s racked up a bunch of losses and, while not mathematically eliminated from the playoffs (primaries), she’s polling in the single-digits and definitely won’t make the big dance (general election).
At least the Lions beat the Chargers and Eagles and tied the Cardinals. Where’s Kamala’s wins? She’s actually worse than the Lions and that’s not an easy feat to achieve.
In addition to being the political equivalent of the Detroit Lions, Harris is also the woman of color equivalent of Hillary Clinton. In 2016, Hillary struggled to name any achievements in decades of public service so she fell back on “I’ve been fighting for (fill in the blank) my entire career.” Harris is doing the same thing. She hasn’t actually done anything of note so she’s claim she “stood up” to stuff to make her seem like less of a failure.
The similarities don’t end there either. Hillary blamed racism and sexism for her loss to Donald Trump. Harris is doing the same thing to excuse her failing campaign. According to her, she’s not doing better because people are not ready for a black and/or female president due to rampant racism and sexism in this country. She’s hoping people forget that Barack Obama was black and president, to preserve her status as a victim.
And the parallels between Harris and Clinton are uncanny. They are both unlikable phonies who have never done anything for anyone besides themselves. They are both hypocrites lacking in self-awareness. They both laugh at their own horrible jokes while everyone else in the room is stone-faced. They both slept their way into politics. Neither of them relate well to black people.
The only difference is that Hillary has made it to the general election, suffering a devastating loss. While Kamala is the Lions, Hillary is more like the Buffalo Bills; she’s been to the big dance but didn’t bring home any hardware.
Winners have actual victories they can point to while losers pretend putting up a valiant fight makes them successful. Winners win while losers loose. Kamal Harris is a loser and she will be out of the race after a pathetic showing in the Iowa caucuses.
