So the irrelevant Iraqi “Parliment” took a vote today to expel all U.S. troops from their country (shithole) because a drone operator killed an Iranian terrorist goat fucker. Although this vote is essentially meaningless, I’m all for it. Why? Because why the hell not? Iraq is a waste of time and it always has been. These “people” do not want democracy or even civilization.
After we beat their pathetic asses in ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’ and saw that a lot of them didn’t want the help to rebuild and change from their primitive ways, we should have just pulled out. But no, we’re the good guys, so we stayed to try to eradicate terrorist criminals and rebuild their infrastructure, etc, etc. And the thanks we get? Threats for killing a “General” who is nothing more than a terrorist in uniform. Like corn in a turd. Can’t say we didn’t try.
Now since President Trump acted, as he should have, to save American lives and honor from this Iranian thug who was in Iraq . . . isn’t that odd . . . and orchestrated an attack on the U.S. Embassy among other killings of Americans, these Iraqi beasts want us out of their country.
Iraq’s Parliament calls for expulsion of US troops from the country following drone attack
Iraqi lawmakers approved a resolution Sunday calling to expel U.S. troops from the country, following an American drone attack that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
The resolution asks the Iraqi government to end the agreement under which Washington sent forces to Iraq more than four years ago to help in the fight against the Islamic State terror group.
More than four years ago? I think that’d be an Obama’s thing. Yet I didn’t hear any libs whining about that then or now.
“The Iraqi government has an obligation to end the presence of all foreign forces on Iraqi soil and prevent it from using Iraqi lands, waters, and airspace or any other reason,” Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mohammed al-Halboosi said in an address to lawmakers before the vote.
The majority of about 180 legislators present in Parliament voted in favor of the resolution. It was backed by most Shiite members of parliament, who hold a majority of seats. Many Sunni and Kurdish legislators did not show up for the session, apparently because they oppose abolishing the deal.
But the Iraqi Parliament vote doesn’t mean that the U.S. military has to leave the country immediately. It’s a non-binding vote, which is seen as mostly symbolic.
The 5,000 U.S. troops are in Iraq at the invitation of the country’s executive branch, the Prime Minister’s officer — not Parliament. It is up to the Iraqi Prime Minister whether the troops will be expelled.
Like I said, the Parliament is irrelevant.
The vote comes two days after a U.S. drone strike killed Soleimani at the Baghdad airport, ratcheting up tensions in the region and raising fears of war.
And liberals are outraged that Trump did such a horrific act. Yet Wikipedia states concerning drone strikes that, “Between 2009 and 2015, out of 473 strikes between 64-116 non-combatant deaths occurred. However during that period, the Obama Administration did count all military-age males in strike zones as combatants unless explicit intelligence exonerated them posthumously.”
Where was the liberal outrage then?
There are over 100,000 Iranian-backed militia fighters in Iraq. Their leaders have called for “revenge” for Soleimani’s death.
Meanwhile, the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq has officially “paused” the training of Iraqi forces and the support of their operations against ISIS to focus on protecting its troops and bases, according to a coalition statement released Sunday.
The coalition said the decision is subject to continuous review.
And I hope it passes. For one, as a commenter on Fox noted, “Don’t forget to destroy all the facilities we left behind when we go and it has been time to go for quite a while. Hopefully this may be the last of the efforts to support “nation building” by America which has been a failure each and every time we attempted it. But do remind them that we will respond to any and all actions against our nation or it’s allies and citizens and the response will not be to their liking.”
While he is not entirely correct, see Germany and Japan, I’d like to add one more thing. No troops in Iraq or Iran means we can declare the entire region a “free fire” zone AND . . . all the troops will be removed from the sandbox, which is what The Orange One said he wanted to do anyway. Win win.
As Bear (Combat Beard) wisely noted in another article, “No need to put boots on the ground. We need to bomb all major infrastructure, water, electric, oil, all hard military targets need to be taken out. Put them back in the stone age. It’s how they want to act and live. Let’s give them what they want.”
Some other communist poster on Fox said something like,
Trump supporters yesterday: Let’s turn the whole area into glass!
Trump supporters today: We don’t want war.
I don’t know who the hell this fuckstick is, or where he gets his information from (maybe the commie lesbian Rachel Maddow), but glass implies using nukes. But while this Trump supporter IS for that, I know it could lead to a very bad situation and there’s no need for that anyway. Missiles, air, and drone strikes are all that are needed to put this one-pebble-away from the stone age “civilization” back to the stone age.
Now I don’t WANT war with the sandies. But should Iran choose to retaliate for the justified killing of a terrorist, PLEASE let what Trump has said would happen . . . happen. Iran should be hit, “Very hard, and very fast.”
And rather than 52 sites to strike, one for each hostage Iran took back in 1979, lets make it 72. One for each virgin these ragheads will allegedly meet in “heaven.”
