Yoko Ono Exploits John Lennon’s Death With Gun Control Demand

40 years ago a crazy person shot and killed John Lennon with an illegally possessed gun in gun-controlled NYC. According to his widow, Yoko Ono, that means that no one should allowed to own guns at all. The untalented weirdo who broke up the Beatles is exploiting the anniversary Lennon’s death to demand a complete disarmament of all Americans.

Every year on December 8, Ono exploits John Lennon’s death by calling for gun control:

She skipped 2016-2018 but picked it up again last year:

And then again in 2020:

As you can see, Ono has added a bunch of gun control hashtags as if it were a mystery that she’s demanding gun control with these tweets. The question is, what kind of gun control does she have in mind? The fact that she’s calling out all gun-related deaths and not just murders or crimes committed with liberals call “assault weapons” indicates that she wants all guns banned and confiscated.

Also, there is this tweet, which says as much:

There you go: Ono wants to end guns for good, so that’s the type of gun control she has in mind. It’s something she also expressed in this tweet:

Ono is demanding radical unconstitutional gun control, which seems unreasonable considering the death she’s exploiting. Mark David Chapman killed John Lennon with a Charter Arms .38-caliber pistol that was 100% illegal to possess in New York City. Also, it was and still is illegal to murder people but that’s beside the point.

Chapman bought the revolver legally in Hawaii and then illegally took it on a plane to NYC, where he illegally possessed it. He then proceeded to illegally discharge the firearm in the commission of a murder. There are no gun control laws that would have stopped that crazy f*cker from doing a crazy and illegal thing.

Ono says that over 1,400,000 Americans have been killed by guns in the 40 years since Lennon’s death. Statistically speaking way more Americans are pissed that Yoko Ono continues to be allowed to make music when John Lennon can’t. None of this however nullifies the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms so her stats are as irrelevant as her art.