George Floyd Trial: Judge Bars Prosecution From Referring To Deceased As ‘Gentle Giant’

Gentle Giant? That seems to ring a bell…

In another blow to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a BLM activist, the judge in the trial of Derek Chauvin has banned the prosecution from referring to George Floyd as a “gentle giant” when legal arguments begin later this month.

The term initially was used back in 2014 to describe 18-year-old Michael Brown who was sent to his great reward back in 2014 while trying to wrest the gun away from a police officer – he lost the draw and paid dearly.

Like Floyd’s demise, the shooting of the “gentle giant” who was, in reality, a hulking thug who just had stolen merchandise from a convenience store right before his fatal encounter with Ferguson cop Darren Wilson, set off riots that were similarly exploited to promote an anti-law enforcement agenda as well as the demonizing of white people in general.

Naturally, just like in every major trial involving a black criminal since O.J. Simpson, a large part of the legal plan whether it be the defenders or the prosecutors is in winning the propaganda war and after Judge Peter Cahill also struck down comparisons between Floyd’s death and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, Ellison and friends suffered a major blow.

While such language will be overflowing in the lunatic fringe sewer of Shitter Twitter, at least they will be stricken from testimony in the actual courtroom.

Via The National File, “Judge Bars Prosecution From Describing George Floyd As ‘Gentle Giant’ At Chauvin Trial”:

Judge Peter Cahill has barred the prosecution in the George Floyd murder trial from describing the deceased convicted felon Floyd as a “gentle giant” or “peaceful person,” just days after allowing a motion that bans the prosecution’s use of comparisons between Floyd’s death and the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Minnesota Public Radio reported Wednesday that Judge Cahill “said the family testimony or “spark of life testimony” is a traditional part of murder trials … which allow for the humanization of the victim — to show that they were loved and valued. But he cautioned that he will not allow ‘character evidence’ – which he defined as any testimony that may describe Floyd as a ‘peaceful person’ or ‘gentle giant.’”

“As soon as you start getting into propensity for violence or propensity for peacefulness, I think then you’re getting into character evidence,” Cahill reportedly said, adding, “And then that does open the door for the defense to cross-examine about his character for peacefulness.”

In other trial-related news, prosecutors have been successful in having a third-degree murder charge against Chauvin reinstated, a fallback for Ellison and his headhunters given the difficulty of proving the second-degree charge and an alternative to manslaughter which would trigger waves of anarchy from sea to shining seas.

Meanwhile, the BLM mouthpieces on Twitter are intensifying efforts to ban the use of the term “George Floyd Trial” because it may suggest that the deceased was himself a criminal.

Jury selection continues…