We haven’t heard from Lindsey Graham 2.0 in a long while. And many see this as a positive. However, remember it’s the 1.0 version that is problematic.
This from redstate.com.
After his seeming transformation during the Donald Trump years, highlighted by a rousing defense of Brett Kavanaugh, the South Carolina senator reverted back to praising Joe Biden and rubber stamping democrat nominees over the last year or so.
Graham was also completely duped during last year’s fight over the now-passed infrastructure bill, throwing his support behind the tax-and-spend radical left.
But while Graham’s spine is made of jello on most issues, there’s something about Supreme Court battles that gets his juices flowing.
Perhaps it’s the extremely establishment nature of such battles? Whatever it is, we saw him respond forcefully with Kavanaugh, with Amy Coney Barrett, and now with Ketanji Brown Jackson.
During the democrat Supreme Court nominee’s confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Graham managed a very clever and extremely triggering bit of questioning.
“What faith are you, by the way?”
Sen. Lindsey Graham questioned Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson on her religion today in an effort to rehash what he said was the “offensive” treatment of Amy Coney Barrett in past confirmation hearings.https://t.co/9OoNKo3GkJ pic.twitter.com/ck9MnlL4bG
— POLITICO (@politico) March 22, 2022
Graham’s line of questioning elicited immediate outrage. How dare he ask a Supreme Court nominee about their religious background? That’s unheard of and completely out of line!
"What faith are you?" is Graham's 1st question in a government that has no religious test for office.
— Lawrence O'Donnell (@Lawrence) March 22, 2022
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) begins his questioning with "What faith are you, by the way?"
Then, this: “Can you fairly judge a Catholic?”
Then, this: “How important is your faith to you?”
Judge Jackson says: “There’s no religious test under the Constitution.” pic.twitter.com/6SPRZZvoGe
— The Recount (@therecount) March 22, 2022
Except that is exactly what the hypocritical democrats did regarding Amy Coney Barrett, and Graham made it clear that he was basing his questioning on that.
Is KBJ’s religion actually relevant? Likely not but neither was ACB’s. Yet, Democrats and mainstream media outlets alike trashed her as some kind of religious nutjob for daring to be observant in her faith.
Noteworthy is that what goes around comes around, and to his credit, Graham had the guts to make democrats reckon with the standard they had previously set.
There was also another interesting aspect of the exchange: KBJ’s answer to the question of what her faith is was “non-denominational Christian.”
[I]t is worth noting that such a descriptor typically denotes a historically Pentecostal background. Given that, when are the media going to start running stories proclaiming KBJ a religious extremist?
ACB, though from a Catholic background, is part of a subsect that also believes in some Pentecostal elements. She was savaged as a crazy person for it.
KBJ should get the same treatment, right?
Of course, she won’t get the same treatment because the “concerns” over any nominee’s religious views come down to one thing: “Keeping the killing of babies in the womb legal.”
KBJ has the “right” (see: far-left) opinion of Roe v. Wade, so nothing about her religion is relevant according to the left.
But if a Republican nominee goes to church and thinks it’s wrong to scramble kids pre-birth, suddenly, religious beliefs are ripe for scrutiny. Funny how that works.
He’s going to do just enough [not to] have himself cast into the outer darkness, politically speaking.
But when push comes to shove, he’s still the same Democrat-friendly, GOP squish he was during the Bush years.
Lest we be fooled by this performance of Lindsey Graham 2.0 rising from the ashes, don’t expect this anomaly to remain around long.
In fact, from his words we may all deduce that Graham 1.0 will be voting for KBJ.
