Horrible Liberals React Badly To Laws That Protect The Unborn

The liberal outrage du jour is over laws recently passed in Georgia and Alabama that protect the rights of the unborn because man, do they hate living babies. The Central Authority of Liberalism sent out a memo to all members instructing them to be furious over this, but didn’t give specifics, leaving liberals on their own on how to express this outrage. Liberals do much better when they are told what to do so these reactions are not only bad, but weird.

Anti-Semitic Women’s March co-founder and declared jihadist wen this way:

Really? She doesn’t see any difference between someone who has been convicted of first-degree murder and an innocent baby? I guess the best way to explain this to her would be to point out that people on death row have brutally killed people and unborn babies haven’t done anything to deserve a death sentence. Also condemned criminals had a chance t answer the charges against them while unborn babies just get whacked without warning. I hope that was helpful for her.

Next we have George Takei with the worst comparison of the week:

Abortions aren’t banned in America and “assault rifles” aren’t even a real thing, but many states have restricted the sale and possession of semi-automatic rifles. In fact, more states ban what liberals call assault rifles than states with commonsense baby safety laws. Plus there’s that whole Constitutional amendment protecting the right to keep and bear arms, while there is no amendment protecting baby killing.

None of that really matters because Takei’s analogy is so far off that to makes no sense. Abortions and rifles are not synonymous. A more appropriate comparison would be killing a million Americans every year with abortions and killing a million Americans every year with guns. Obviously nowhere near 1 million Americans die every year from guns, but they do from abortion. Also, killing people with guns is illegal while killing them with abortions is not.

Then we find this creepy “protest” from out-of-work actress Alyssa Milano:

Is she seriously advocating for abortions while using her child, who clearly wasn’t aborted, as a prop? Yes she is. That’s demented but it gets even sicker when you realize she’s saying that she hopes one day her little girl grows up to kill a baby of her own.

Finally there’s this confusing thing from model Emily Ratajkowski:

I’m sorry, what was she mad about? I don’t remember because I can’t stop looking at them titties.

As you can see, when liberals are left to their own devices they have no idea what they are doing. This why they must be told how to think and act. Without proper instructions a simple abortion ban protest becomes assault rifles, living children, and boobs.