Home
Democrat Sean Casten Says People With ‘Small Genitals’ Can’t Own Guns

Democrat Sean Casten Says People With ‘Small Genitals’ Can’t Own Guns

Democrats have long sought to tie gun ownership rights to some make-believe government mandated need like hunting but Rep. Sean Casten has taken it further by  saying you must be hung like a horse to own a firearm. The Illinois democrat claims that having small genitals disqualifies a person from owning a gun. I’m not sure what Constitution he was reading when he came up with this theory but it’s certainly not the U.S. Constitution, which literally has no references to dick sizes anywhere in it.

Casten was doing a Zoom call with students when this popped out of his sad little head:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3CsAZthtyo&feature=emb_logo

“If you are a constitutional originalist, unless you’re a member of a well-regulated militia, tell me why you need to own a gun?” Casten asked.

I really wish democrats would actually read the 2nd Amendment because it doesn’t say one damn thing about guns rights being tied to some need determined but the government. It also doesn’t come close to mentioning this:

“Having small genitals is not a sufficient reason to own a gun,” said Casten.

The is is from the democratic Party’s alternate Bill of Rights:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed unless you have a small wang and then the democratic party can deny your gun ownership rights.

What a ridiculous thing to say. Obviously Casten was going for that tired narrative that the only reason why anyone would own a gun is to compensate for a small penis.

Here’s a fact: Porn legend John Holmes was a gun owner and that guy had 13 inches of swinging meat between his legs.

And what about women gun owners? Casten seems to be under the impression that women are also compensating for small genitals. How does one go about measuring a vagina? Depth? Width? Volume? Gravitational pull? Also I’m pretty sure the small ones are more desirable because you’ve never heard a woman bargain about her massive vag.

After getting called out for this stupid and offensive statement, Casten went on a 37-tweet rant defending his unconstitutional hatred for a basic American right. Here he is dreaming out loud about taking our guns away:

Next he called the idea of anyone defending themselves with a firearm “laughably stupid” and then used the stand-up comedy of an Australian leftist as proof:

Then he gave a geography lesson to justify confiscating our guns:

You what other places are driving distance to Indiana and Wisconsin? Indaina and Wisconsin. How come those places don’t have nearly the gun-related violence problems like Chicago? Something to think about.

And then there is this:

Is it funny to joke about taking away other civil rights based on physical characteristics? Can we joke that certain people shouldn’t be allowed to vote because of their skin color? Oh wait, the democrats already did that and it wasn’t a joke.

While there is no link between genital size and gun ownership the science is solid in the link to small brains and being a democrat. Having a massive vag like Casten, doesn’t hurt either.