Democrat Is Sickened That School Children Will Be Protected From Mass Shootings

Most people are horrified and saddened when children are killed in a gun-free zone mass shooting magnet like a school, but not democrats. They actually take glee in school shootings because they know it allows then to shamelessly exploit the dead and push their unconstitutional gun control agenda. One democrat from Pennsylvania is so ghoulish like this that he’s literally sickened that some kids in his state will actually be protected by armed good guys.

Let’s start with this story from Philly.com about the Tamaqua Area School District in Schuylkill County, PA:

After Columbine, the school district got metal detectors, which are no longer used. Now, students carry transparent backpacks.

In the wake of the Parkland, Fla., school shooting, the Tamaqua board decided that wasn’t enough. Last month, it unanimously passed a policy allowing teachers and other employees in their four schools to carry firearms, becoming the first in the state to do so.

That’s already pretty cool, but this is simply awesome:

The school board president said he imagines a sign posted outside each building, something like: “Staff members at this school are armed. If you wish to do harm, enter at your own risk.”

The school board stated that not only would armed teachers be able to take down a potential mass shooter, just the knowledge that some teachers are armed would be a deterrent to any would-be spree killer. Also, this isn’t some scheme to give guns to teachers who don’t want them or can’t handle them, the program is voluntary and the teachers who sign up will receive training.

If you’re reading this right now, you probably agree this is great thing that will actually protect children, unlike the liberal plan to completely disarm all law-abiding Americans. Rep. Brendan Boyle, like a boil on the ass of Congress, however thinks this is the most vile thing he’s ever heard of. Check out his disgust:

Jeff Foxworthy would say, “If you are disgusted but he thought of children being safe, you just might be a liberal.” Actually, he’d probably say, “What the f*ck is the matter with you? Have you no soul or human compassion?”

And what Boyle is saying is that it makes him want to puke at the thought that school kids might not be killed by a gun-toting lunatic. Making it worse, his general queasiness is because he’s anti-gun and doesn’t like the fact that good guys with guns are the only thing that can stop bad guys with guns.

Boyle also says that this simple commonsense solution is “not the answer.” Okay, please tell us what is the answer. When a madman bursts into a class room and starts shooting innocent children, how does he propose to stop it? With an enhanced background check system? By banning guns that look scary? With an unearned sense of liberal moral superiority? If criminals gave a shit about what the law says, they wouldn’t be criminals.

There are a couple of other “answers” Boyle could be referring to and they are somehow actually dumber. Earlier this year a school in the same general area of Pennsylvania decided to arm teachers with miniature souvenir baseball bats to stop mass shooters. In the same county as the one that is arming teachers with guns another school district has placed buckets of river rocks in classrooms so children can skip stones at gun-wielding maniacs.

A boil is a festering puss-filled wound and so are Brendan Boyle’s ideas on school safety. As a US Congressman he enjoys the armed protection of a variety of government agencies, but he doesn’t want the same for school children? That makes him a piece of shit and more importantly it makes him a typical democrat.